Data extracted in October 2020
Fiche created in December 2023

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises all the environmental and climate impacts of LOW AMMONIA EMISSION TECHNIQUES FOR MINERAL FERTILISATION found in a review of 5 synthesis papers[1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 62 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4. The impacts reported here are those for which there is scientific evidence available in published synthesis papers, what does not preclude the farming practice to have other impacts on the environment and climate still not covered by primary studies or by synthesis papers.

The synthesis papers review a number of primary studies ranging from 39 to 376. Therefore, the assessment of impacts relies on a large number of results from the primary studies, obtained mainly in field conditions, or sometimes in lab experiments or from model simulations.

1.     DESCRIPTION OF THE FARMING PRACTICE

  • Description:
    • Low-ammonia-emission techniques for mineral fertilisation are fertilisation techniques used to reduce agricultural emissions of ammonia from mineral fertilisers.
  • Key descriptors:
    • Low-ammonia-emission techniques for mineral fertilisation include improved fertilisation techniques based on: 1) use of non-urea based fertilisers; 2) change in fertiliser placement: deep placement; 3) fertiliser time distribution: split application; 4) use of irrigation after fertilisation; 5) use of amendment with sorbents; 6) crop residue left on soil.
    • Low-ammonia-emission techniques for mineral fertilisation exclude strategies aimed at reducing ammonia emissions from organic fertilisers, livestock and manure management.

2.    EFFECTS OF THE FARMING PRACTICE ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

We reviewed the impacts of mineral fertilisation when using low-ammonia-emission techniques, as compared to conventional fertilisation techniques (Table 1).

The table below shows the number of synthesis papers with statistical tests reporting i) a significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator, that is to say, a significant statistical effect, which can be positive or negative; or ii) a non-statistically significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator. In addition, we include, if any, the number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects. Details on the quality assessment of the synthesis papers can be found in the methodology section of this WIKI.

Out of the 5 selected synthesis papers, 3 included studies conducted in Europe, and 5 have a quality score higher than 50%.

Table 1: Summary of effects. Number of synthesis papers reporting positive, negative or non-statistically significant effects on environmental and climate impacts. The number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects are also provided. When not all the synthesis papers reporting an effect are of high quality, the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50% is indicated in parentheses. Some synthesis papers may report effects for more than one impact, or more than one effect for the same impact.

 

 

 

 

Statistically tested

Non-statistically tested

Impact

Metric

Intervention

Comparator

 Significantly positive

Significantly negative

Non-significant

Decrease Air pollutants emissions

NH3 emissions

Amendment with sorbents

No amendment with sorbents

1

0

0

0

Deep placement

Superficial placement

4

0

0

0

Irrigation after fertilisation

No irrigation after fertilisation

2

0

0

0

Non-urea-based fertilizers

Urea-based fertilisers

1

0

0

0

Soil cover with plant residues

Crop residue removal

0

1

0

0

Split application

Single application

2

0

2

0

Decrease GHG emissions

N2O emissions

Deep placement

Superficial placement

0

0

1

0

Split application

Single application

0

0

1

0

Decrease Nutrient leaching and run-off

N leaching

Split application

Single application

1

0

0

0

Decrease Nutrient leaching and run-off

N run-off

Deep placement

Superficial placement

1

0

0

0

Split application

Single application

1

0

0

0

Increase Plant nutrient uptake

N uptake

Deep placement

Superficial placement

2

0

0

0

Split application

Single application

1

0

0

0

Increase Crop yield

Crop yield

Deep placement

Superficial placement

3

0

0

0

Split application

Single application

2

0

0

0

3.     FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTS ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The factors significantly influencing the size and/or direction of the effects on the impacts, according to the synthesis papers included in this review, are reported below. Details about the factors can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses available in this WIKI.

Table 2: List of factors reported to significantly affect the size and/or direction of the effects on environmental and climate impacts, according to the synthesis papers reviewed. The reference number of the synthesis papers where those factors are explored is given in parentheses.

Impact

Factors

Air pollutants emissions

Crop type (Ref2), N application rate (Ref5), Soil pH (Ref2) and Soil total nitrogen content (Ref2)

GHG emissions

Crop type (Ref2)

Nutrient leaching and run-off

Crop type (Ref2)

Plant nutrient uptake

Phenological crop growth stage (Ref4) and Placement technique (Ref4)

Crop yield

Crop type (Ref4), Fertlizer type (Ref4) and Placement technique (Ref4)

4.    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY

Table 3: Systematic review search strategy - methodology and search parameters.

Parameter

Details

Keywords

WOS: TOPIC: ("ammonia emission*" OR "nitrogen emission*" OR "ammonia loss*" OR "nitrogen loss*") AND TOPIC: ("meta-analy*" OR "systematic* review*" OR "evidence map" OR "global synthesis" OR "evidence synthesis" OR "research synthesis")

 and

SCOPUS: TITLE-ABS-KEY: ("ammonia emission*" OR "nitrogen emission*" OR "ammonia loss*" OR "nitrogen loss*") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY: ("meta-analy*" OR "systematic* review*" OR "evidence map" OR "global synthesis" OR "evidence synthesis" OR "research synthesis")

Time reference

No time restriction.

Databases

Web of Science and Scopus: run on 06 October 2020

Exclusion criteria

The main criteria that led to the exclusion of a synthesis paper are: 
 1) The topic of the meta-analysis is out of the scope of this review, 2) The paper is neither a systematic review nor a meta-analysis of primary research, 3) The paper does not assess the impacts of low-ammonia techniques in comparison to another fertilization technique, 4) The analysis is not based on pairwise comparisons, 5) The paper is not written in English and 6) The full text is not available. 

The search returned 59 synthesis papers from WOS and SCOPUS on Low ammonia emission techniques for mineral fertilisation plus other 3 retrieved in the search of other farming practices, potentially relevant for the practice object of our fiche. 
From the 62 potentially relevant synthesis papers, 46 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and 11 after reading the full text according to the above-mentioned criteria. Finally, 5 synthesis papers were selected.

5.     SYNTHESIS PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW

Table 4: List of synthesis papers included in this review. More details can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses.

Ref Num

Author(s)

Year

Title

Journal

DOI

Ref1

Ti, C; Xia, L; Chang, SX; Yan, X;

2019

Potential for mitigating global agricultural ammonia emission: A meta-analysis

Environmental Pollution, 245, 141-148

10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.124

Ref2

Xia, L., Lam, S. K., Chen, D., Wang, J., Tang, Q., & Yan, X.

2017

Can knowledge‐based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta‐analysis

Global Change Biology 23.5 (2017): 1917-1925.

10.1111/gcb.13455

Ref3

Huang, S; Lv, W; Bloszies, S; Shi, Q; Pan, X; Zeng, Y.

2016

Effects of fertilizer management practices on yield-scaled ammonia emissions from croplands in China: A meta-analysis

Field Crops Research, 192, 118-125.

10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.023

Ref4

Nkebiwea PM,  Weinmannb M, Bar-Tal A, Müller T

2016

Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: A review and meta-analysis

Field Crops Research 196 (2016) 389–401

10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.018

Ref5

Pan, BB; Lam, SK; Mosier, A; Luo, YQ; Chen, DL;

2016

Ammonia volatilization from synthetic fertilizers and its mitigation strategies: A global synthesis

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 232, 283-289

10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019

 

Disclaimer: These fiches present a large amount of scientific knowledge synthesised to assess farming practices impacts on the environment, climate and productivity. The European Commission maintains this WIKI to enhance public access to information about its initiatives. Our goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will try to correct them. However, the Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information on these fiches and WIKI.


[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results. Details can be found in the methodology section of the WIKI.

  • No labels