Data extracted in January 2021
Fiche created in December 2023

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises all the environmental and climate impacts of ORGANIC FERTILISATION found in a review of 32 synthesis papers[1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 185 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4. The impacts reported here are those for which there is scientific evidence available in published synthesis papers, what does not preclude the farming practice to have other impacts on the environment and climate still not covered by primary studies or by synthesis papers.

The synthesis papers review a number of primary studies ranging from 10 to 238. Therefore, the assessment of impacts relies on a large number of results from the primary studies, obtained mainly in field conditions, or sometimes in lab experiments or from model simulations.

1.      DESCRIPTION OF THE FARMING PRACTICE

  • Description:
    • Organic fertilisation is the application to soils of plant or animal-derived materials containing organic forms of nutrients that microorganisms in the soil decompose, making them available for use by plants.[2]
  • Key descriptors:
    • This review includes the application of organic fertilisers from different animal (cattle, pig, sheep, poultry, earthworms), plant and mixed (municipal and agro-industrial waste) sources used both as composted and non-composted manures. 
    • When organic fertilisation was combined with mineral fertilisation and compared to mineral fertilisation, we only included results in which: i) the intervention and the comparator had the same mineral fertilisation strategy; ii) the organic fertilisation partially substituted the mineral fertilisation in the intervention. Since organic fertilisation alone did not show different qualitative effects than organic fertilisation combined with organic fertilisation, we pooled both types of interventions as “organic fertilisation”.
    • Green manure (the use of a cover crop to fertilise the soil for the following crop) and crop residues were excluded, as their impacts are assessed in separate sets of fiches.

2.     EFFECTS OF THE FARMING PRACTICE ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

We reviewed the impacts of organic fertilisation (alone or in combination with mineral fertilisation) compared to either mineral fertilisation or no fertilisation.

The table below shows the number of synthesis papers with statistical tests reporting i) a significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator, that is to say, a significant statistical effect, which can be positive or negative; or ii) a non-statistically significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator. In addition, we include, if any, the number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects. Details on the quality assessment of the synthesis papers can be found in the methodology section of this WIKI.

Out of the 32 selected synthesis papers, 29 included studies conducted in Europe, and 31 have a quality score higher than 50%.

Table 1: Summary of effects. Number of synthesis papers reporting positive, negative or non-statistically significant effects on environmental and climate impacts. The number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects are also provided. When not all the synthesis papers reporting an effect are of high quality, the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50% is indicated in parentheses. Some synthesis papers may report effects for more than one impact, or more than one effect for the same impact.

 

 

 

 

Statistically tested

Non-statistically tested

Impact

Metric

Intervention

Comparator

 Significantly positive

Significantly negative

Non-significant

Decrease Air pollutants emissions

NH3 emissions

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

2

0

1

0

Decrease Air pollutants emissions

NO emissions

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

0

1

0

0

Increase Carbon sequestration

Soil organic carbon

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

7

0

1

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

5

0

0

0

Decrease GHG emissions

Soil CH4 emissions

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

0

1

1

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

0

1

0

0

Decrease GHG emissions

Soil N2O emissions

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

1

2

6

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

1

5

1

0

Decrease Nutrient leaching and run-off

N leaching and run-off

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

1

0

0

0

Increase Plant nutrient uptake

Nutrient use efficiency

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

0

1

1

0

Increase Soil biological quality

Soil biological quality

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

4

0

0

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

3

1

1

0

Increase Soil nutrients

Soil nutrients

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

4 (3)

0

2 (1)

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

4

0

1

0

Increase Crop yield

Crop yield

Organic fertilisation

Mineral fertilisation

2

0

4

0

Organic fertilisation

No fertilisation

5

0

0

0

3.      FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTS ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The factors significantly influencing the size and/or direction of the effects on the impacts, according to the synthesis papers included in this review, are reported below. Details about the factors can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses available in this WIKI.

Table 2: List of factors reported to significantly affect the size and/or direction of the effects on environmental and climate impacts, according to the synthesis papers reviewed. The reference number of the synthesis papers where those factors are explored is given in parentheses.

Impact

Factors

Air pollutants emissions

Duration of treatment (Ref7), N application rate (Ref19), Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref7), Soil C/N ratio (Ref19), Soil mineral N (Ref19), Soil organic carbon (Ref19), Soil pH (Ref19) and Soil texture (Ref19)

Carbon sequestration

Climate (Ref13, Ref23, Ref27), Cumulative organic fertiliser C input (Ref27), Duration of treatment (Ref13, Ref23), Mineral N fertiliser application rate (Ref13), Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref7, Ref28), Organic fertiliser type (Ref13, Ref27, Ref28), Soil N, P and organic carbon (Ref13), Soil pH (Ref13), Soil texture (Ref5), Soil texture and soil type (Ref13) and Tillage intensity (Ref28)

GHG emissions

Annual precipitation (Ref31), Climate (Ref8, Ref22), Crop type (Ref8, Ref29), Difference in total N inputs between organic and mineral fertilisers (Ref18), Duration of treatment (Ref7, Ref8), Mean annual temperature (Ref31), N application rate (Ref29), Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref2, Ref7), Organic fertiliser C/N ratio (Ref16, Ref18), Organic fertiliser N content (Ref16), Organic fertiliser type (Ref2), Soil clay content (Ref18), Soil organic carbon (Ref8), Soil pH (Ref22), Soil texture (Ref16, Ref22), Tillage (Ref29), Water filled pore space (Ref8) and Water management (Ref29)

Nutrient leaching and run-off

Duration of treatment (Ref7) and Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref7)

Plant nutrient uptake

Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref7), Organic fertiliser C/N ratio (Ref4) and Organic fertiliser mineral N/total N ratio (Ref4)

Soil biological quality

Climate (Ref5, Ref13, Ref32), Duration of treatment (Ref13), Organic fertiliser C content (Ref24), Organic fertiliser N content (Ref24), Organic fertiliser type (Ref32), Soil pH (Ref13), Soil texture (Ref5, Ref13) and Soil type (Ref13)

Soil nutrients

Climate (Ref25), Duration of treatment (Ref25), Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref13), Organic fertiliser type (Ref13), Soil Olsen P levels (Ref13), Soil type (Ref5 and Ref25)

Crop yield

Climate (Ref13, Ref21), Crop type (Ref13, Ref15, Ref21), Duration of treatment (Ref7, Ref13, Ref15), Mineral fertiliser addition (Ref9), Mineral N fertiliser application rate (Ref13), Organic fertiliser application rate (Ref7, Ref15), Organic fertiliser type (Ref9, Ref13, Ref14, Ref21), Plant family (Ref9), Plant functional type (Ref9), Soil N, P and organic carbon (Ref13), Soil organic matter (Ref21), Soil pH (Ref13, Ref15), Soil texture (Ref15), Soil texture and soil type (Ref13), Tillage (Ref15), Time before sowing (Ref15) and Water management (Ref21)

4.     SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY

Table 3: Systematic review search strategy - methodology and search parameters.

Parameter

Details

Keywords

WOS: TOPIC: ((organic near/4 fert*) OR (organic near/4 amend*) OR (manure near/4 application) OR (manure near/4 distribution) OR (vermicompost*)) AND TOPIC: ("meta-analy*" OR "systematic* review*" OR "evidence map" OR "global synthesis" OR "evidence synthesis" OR "research synthesis")

 and

SCOPUS: ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( organic  W/4  fert* )  OR  ( organic  W/4  amend* )  OR  ( manure  W/4  application )  OR  ( manure  W/4  distribution ) OR (vermicompost*) )  AND  TITLE-ABS-KEY ( ( "meta-analy*"  OR  "systematic* review*"  OR  "evidence map"  OR  "global synthesis"  OR  "evidence synthesis"  OR  "research synthesis" ) ) ) 

Time reference

No time restriction.

Databases

Web of Science and Scopus: run on 13 January 2021

Exclusion criteria

The main criteria that led to the exclusion of a synthesis paper are: 
 1) The topic of the meta-analysis is out of the scope of this review., 2) The paper is neither a systematic review nor a meta-analysis of primary research., 3) The analysis is not based on pairwise comparisons, 4) The strategy of fertilization is not clearly stated or is mixed, 5) Fertilisation is combined organic + mineral fertilisers vs organic fertilisers., 6) Organic fertisation is done with crop residues, 7) Results do not include experiments done in Europe, 8) The paper is not written in English. and 9) The full text is not available. 

The search returned 0 synthesis papers from WOS and SCOPUS on Organic fertilisation plus other 185 retrieved in the search of other farming practices, potentially relevant for the practice object of our fiche. 
From the 185 potentially relevant synthesis papers, 50 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and 80 after reading the full text according to the above-mentioned criteria. Finally, 32 synthesis papers were selected.

5.     SYNTHESIS PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW

Table 4: List of synthesis papers included in this review. More details can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses.

Ref Num

Author(s)

Year

Title

Journal

DOI

Ref1

Cao, Y; He, Z; Zhu, T; Zhao, F

2021

Organic-C quality as a key driver of microbial nitrogen immobilization in soil: A meta-analysis

GEODERMA, 383, 114784.

10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114784

Ref2

Shakoor, A; Shakoor, S; Rehman, A; Ashraf, F; Abdullah, M; Shahzad, SM; Farooq, TH; Ashraf, M; Manzoor, MA; Altaf, MM; Altaf, MA

2021

Effect of animal manure, crop type, climate zone, and soil attributes on greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils—A global meta-analysis

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 278, 124019.

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124019

Ref3

Yang, L; Deng, Y; Wang, X; Zhang, W; Shi, X; Chen, X; Lakshmanan, P; Zhang, F

2021

Global direct nitrous oxide emissions from the bioenergy crop sugarcane (Saccharum spp. inter-specific hybrids)

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 752, 141795.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141795

Ref4

Huygens, D; Orveillon, G; Lugato, E; Tavazzi, S; Comero, S; Jones, A; Gawlik, B; Saveyn, HGM

2020

Technical proposals for the safe use of processed manure above the threshold established for Nitrate Vulnerable Zones by the Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC).

EUR 30363 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

10.2760/373351

Ref5

Liu, S; Wang, J; Pu, S; Blagodatskaya, E; Kuzyakov, Y; Razavi, BS

2020

Impact of manure on soil biochemical properties: A global synthesis

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 745, 141003.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141003

Ref6

Morugán-Coronado, A; Linares, C; Gómez-López, MD; Faz, Á; Zornoza, R

2020

The impact of intercropping, tillage and fertilizer type on soil and crop yield in fruit orchards under Mediterranean conditions: A meta-analysis of field studies.

AGRICOLTURAL SYSTEMS, 178, 102736.

10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102736

Ref7

Wei, ZB; Ying, H; Guo, XW; Zhuang, MH; Cui, ZL; Zhang, FS

2020

Substitution of Mineral Fertilizer with Organic Fertilizer in Maize Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Reduced Nitrogen and Carbon Emissions

AGRONOMY, 10, 1149.

10.3390/agronomy10081149

Ref8

Xia, F; Mei, K; Xu, Y; Zhang, C; Dahlgren, RA; Zhang, MH

2020

Response of N2O emission to manure application in field trials of agricultural soils across the globe

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 733, 139390.

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139390

Ref9

Blouin, M; Barrere, J; Meyer, N; Lartigue, S; Barot, S; Mathieu, J

2019

Vermicompost significantly affects plant growth. A meta-analysis

AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 39, 34.

10.1007/s13593-019-0579-x

Ref10

Luo, GW; Sun, B; Li, L; Li, MH; Liu, MQ; Zhu, YY; Guo, SW; Ling, N; Shen, QR

2019

Understanding how long-term organic amendments increase soil phosphatase activities: Insight into phoD- and phoC-harboring functional microbial populations

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 139, 107632.

10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107632

Ref11

Luo, WQ; O'Brien, PL; Hatfield, JL

2019

Crop Yield and Nitrous Oxide Emissions following Swine Manure Application: A Meta-Analysis

AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL LETTERS, 4(1), 190024.

10.2134/ael2019.07.0024

Ref12

Ti, C; Xia, L; Chang, SX; Yan, X;

2019

Potential for mitigating global agricultural ammonia emission: A meta-analysis

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 245, 141-148.

10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.124

Ref13

Chen, YS; Camps-Arbestain, M; Shen, QH; Singh, B; Cayuela, ML

2018

The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 111, 103-125.

10.1007/s10705-017-9903-5

Ref14

Fabio, ES; Smart, LB

2018

Effects of nitrogen fertilization in shrub willow short rotation coppice production - a quantitative review

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 10(8), 548-564.

10.1111/gcbb.12507

Ref15

Lin, Y; Watts, DB; Van Santen, E; Cao, G.

2018

Influence of poultry litter on crop productivity under different field conditions: A meta-analysis

AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 110(3), 807-818.

10.2134/agronj2017.09.0513

Ref16

Charles, A; Rochette, P; Whalen, JK; Angers, DA; Chantigny, MH; Bertrand, N

2017

Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 236, 88-98.

10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021

Ref17

Dai, SY; Wang, J; Cheng, Y; Zhang, JB; Cai, ZC

2017

Effects of long-term fertilization on soil gross N transformation rates and their implications

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE,16, 2863-2870.

10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61673-3

Ref18

Han, Z; Walter, MT; Drinkwater, LE

2017

N2O emissions from grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of the impacts of fertilizer-based and ecologically-based nutrient management strategies

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 107, 335-355.

10.1007/s10705-017-9836-z

Ref19

Liu, SW; Lin, F; Wu, S; Ji, C; Sun, Y; Jin, YG; Li, SQ; Li, ZF; Zou, JW

2017

A meta-analysis of fertilizer-induced soil NO and combined NO+N2O emissions

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 23(6), 2520-2532.

10.1111/gcb.13485

Ref20

Liu, XJA; van Groenigen, KJ; Dijkstra, P; Hungate, BA

2017

Increased plant uptake of native soil nitrogen following fertilizer addition - not a priming effect?

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 114, 105-110.

10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.011

Ref21

Wortman, SE; Holmes, AA; Miernicki, E; Knoche, K; Pittelkow, CM

2017

First‐Season Crop Yield Response to Organic Soil Amendments: A Meta‐Analysis

AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 109(4), 1210–1217.

10.2134/agronj2016.10.0627

Ref22

Zhou, MH; Zhu, B; Wang, SJ; Zhu, XY; Vereecken, H; Bruggemann, N

2017

Stimulation of N2O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits: a global meta-analysis

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 23, 4068-4083.

10.1111/gcb.13648

Ref23

Han, PF; Zhang, W; Wang, GC; Sun, WJ; Huang, Y

2016

Changes in soil organic carbon in croplands subjected to fertilizer management: a global meta-analysis

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 6 27199.

10.1038/srep27199

Ref24

Liu, T; Chen, XY; Hu, F; Ran, W; Shen, QR; Li, HX; Whalen, JK

2016

Carbon-rich organic fertilizers to increase soil biodiversity: Evidence from a meta-analysis of nematode communities

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 232, 199-207.

10.1016/j.agee.2016.07.015

Ref25

Pecio, A; Jarosz, Z

2016

Long-term effects of soil management practices on selected indicators of chemical soil quality.

ACTA AGROBOTANICA, 69, 1–18.

10.5586/aa.1662

Ref26

Vicente-Vicente, JL; Garcia-Ruiz, R; Francaviglia, R; Aguilera, E; Smith, P

2016

Soil carbon sequestration rates under Mediterranean woody crops using recommended management practices: A meta-analysis

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 235, 204-214.

10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024

Ref27

Maillard, É; Angers, DA

2014

Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: A meta-analysis

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 20, 666–679.

10.1111/gcb.12438

Ref28

Aguilera, E; Lassaletta, L; Gattinger, A; Gimeno, BS

2013

Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: A meta-analysis

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 168, 25-36.

10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003

Ref29

Aguilera, E; Lassaletta, L; Sanz-Cobena, A; Garnier, J; Vallejo, A

2013

The potential of organic fertilizers and water management to reduce N2O emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems. A review

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 164, 32-52.

10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.006

Ref30

Linquist, BA; Adviento-Borbe, MA; Pittelkow, CM; van Kessel, C; van Groenigen, KJ

2012

Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: A quantitative review and analysis

FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 135, 10-21.

10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.007

Ref31

Liu, Z; Powers, W

2012

Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from swine manure land application

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERS, 2012 Annual International Meeting, 5, 3829-3843.

10.13031/2013.41918

Ref32

Kallenbach, C; Grandy, AS

2011

Controls over soil microbial biomass responses to carbon amendments in agricultural systems: A meta-analysis

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 144(1), 241-252.

10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.020

 

Disclaimer: These fiches present a large amount of scientific knowledge synthesised to assess farming practices impacts on the environment, climate and productivity. The European Commission maintains this WIKI to enhance public access to information about its initiatives. Our goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will try to correct them. However, the Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information on these fiches and WIKI.


[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results. Details can be found in the methodology section of the WIKI.

[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2009. Glossary on Organic Agriculture (http://www.fao.org/organicag/en/).

  • No labels