You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Data extracted in December 2021

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises the environmental and climate impacts of different GRASSLAND MANAGEMENT practices, namely soil organic amendment, soil fertilisation with conventional or with enhanced-efficiency fertilisers, mowing, grazing and increasing grass/forb species richness, found in a systematic review of 34 synthesis research papers [1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 1022 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4. 

As each synthesis research paper involves a number of primary research papers -ranging from 12 to 257-, the assessment of impacts relies on a large number of results obtained mainly in field experiments (carried out in situations close to real farming environment), and sometimes in lab experiments or from model simulations.  

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE FARMING PRACTICE 

Description  

  • Grasslands are areas of land predominantly covered by communities of grass-like plants and forbs and may include sparsely occurring trees and shrubs. In the Eurostat classification, percentages of area covered by such canopies are limited to less than 10 % in the case of trees and to less than 20 % in the case of shrubs (i.e., low woody plants capable of reaching heights of up to 5 metres [2]) [3]. However, in the scientific literature reviewed here, grasslands are usually more broadly defined and might not fully meet such canopy limits. 
  • This review includes a wide variety of grassland types: savannah, grassy deserts, seasonally flooded grasslands, prairies, meadows, pastures, rangelands, salt-marshes, bioenergy perennial grasslands, calcareous grasslands and wooded grasslands. Grasslands differ in terms of: 
  • management intensity: natural, semi-natural, improved and intensively managed, 
  • management history: permanent and temporary, 
  • successional stage: ancient and secondary grasslands, 
  • biomes and climates: semi-arid, temperate, tropical, Mediterranean, tundra, alpine, subalpine, artic and subartic. 
  • Fodder crops are not included as grasslands. 
  • This review includes several interventions on grasslands: 
  • Soil organic amendments are materials of plant or animal origin that can be added to soil, such as manures, biosolids, green wastes, and composts, to improve the soil quality in terms of its structure and biochemical function [4]. This includes also biochar, which is charcoal produced by pyrolysis of biomass in the absence of oxygen. 
  • Enhanced-efficiency fertilisers (EEF) are different types of fertilisers or products associated to fertilisers, which have been developed to better synchronize fertiliser nitrogen (N) release with crop uptake, offering the potential for enhanced N-use efficiency (NUE) in crops and reduce losses5. This review includes the use of different types of EEF, namely nitrification inhibitors, urease inhibitors and polymer-coated fertilisers. 
  • Fertilisers are natural or synthetic substances containing chemical elements such as nitrogen, phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) that are applied to soils to improve growth and productiveness of plants6. This review includes the use of both mineral and organic conventional fertilisers. 
  • Mowing is a harvesting practice consisting on cutting the grass. 
  • Grazing is a method of animal husbandry in which livestock are allowed to feed outdoors consuming wild vegetation. Please, note that in this set of fiches grazing is only explored when compared to mowing. Grazing and different grazing intensity are explored in a separate set of fiches.  
  • Increasing grass/forb species richness is a practice normally used to improve the agronomical performance of some grasslands. It consists on reseedings, generally with pluriannual grasses and legumes7. 

Key descriptors  

  • This review does not include other practices conducted in grasslands such as grazing nor the conversion of other agricultural land uses to grasslands, which are assessed in separate sets of fiches. 
  • The management practices reviewed here are only conducted in grasslands. However, the use in croplands (i.e., with no distinction between arable lands and grasslands) of nitrification inhibitors and other enhance-efficiency fertilisers, biochar and other soil organic amendments and fertilisers, are assessed in other sets of fiches. 
  • For greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the use of fertilisers is explored separately for N and P fertilisers as effects slightly differ. 

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPACTS OF THE FARMING PRACTICE ON CLIMATE AND THE ENVIRONMENT

We reviewed the impacts in grasslands of different soil management practices (namely, the use of enhanced-efficiency fertilisers, soil organic amendments and conventional fertilisers) compared to grasslands without such management (Table 1). We also reviewed the impacts in grasslands of grazing, mowing more or less than once a year compared to grasslands mowed once a year (Table 2). Finally, we reviewed the impacts in grasslands of practices pursuing to increase grass/forb species richness compared to grasslands with lower or only one species (Table 3). 

The tables show the number of synthesis papers reporting positive, negative or no effect, based on the statistical comparison of the intervention and the control. In addition, we include the number of systematic reviews, if any, reporting relevant results, but without statistical test of the effects (“uncertain”). The numbers between parentheses indicate the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50%. Details on quality criteria can be found in the methodology section of this WIKI. 

Out of the 34 synthesis papers selected, 33 reported studies conducted in Europe while one did not report the geographical origin of the studies included; 33 synthesis papers have a quality score higher than 50%. Some synthesis papers reported more than one impact. 

Table 1. Impacts of the use of enhanced-efficiency fertilisers, soil organic amendments and conventional fertilisers compared to grasslands without such management. 

Impact 

Intervention 

Comparator 

Positive 

Negative 

No effect 

Uncertain* 

Decrease air pollutants emissions 

Enhanced-efficiency fertilisers (EEF) 

No EEF 

0 

0 

0 

1 (0) 

Increase biodiversity 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

0 

0 

2 (2) 

0 

Fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

1 (1) 

4 (4) 

1 (1) 

0 

Decrease ecotoxicity 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

Decrease GHG emissions 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Enhanced-efficiency fertilisers (EEF) 

No EEF 

3 (3) 

0 

2 (2) 

0 

N fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

0 

3 (3) 

0 

0 

NP fertilisers 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

P fertilisers 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Decrease nutrient leaching and run-off 

 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

0 

1(1) 

0 

0 

Enhanced-efficiency fertilisers (EEF) 

No EEF 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

Decrease pests and diseases  

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Increase soil biological quality 

N fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

2 (2) 

2 (2) 

4 (4) 

0 

Decrease soil erosion 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

Increase soil nutrients 

Fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

3 (3) 

1 (1) 

3 (3) 

0 

Increase carbon sequestration 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

N fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Increase soil water retention 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

N fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Increase plant nutrient uptake 

N fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

Increase grassland production 

Soil organic amendments 

No amendments 

2 (2) 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

Enhanced-efficiency fertilisers (EEF) 

No EEF 

1 (1) 

0 

0 

0 

Fertilisers 

No fertilisers 

7 (7) 

0 

4 (4) 

0 

* Number of systematic reviews that report relevant results but without statistical test comparison of the intervention and the control. 

Table 2. Impacts of mowing more or less than once a year compared to mowing once a year. 

Impact 

Intervention 

Comparator 

Positive 

Negative 

No effect 

Uncertain 

Increase biodiversity 

Delayed first mowing date 

Early first mowing date 

1 (1) 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Grazing 

Mowing once a year 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Mowing less than once a year 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Mowing more than once a year 

0 

0 

1 (1) 

0 

Table 3. Impacts of increasing grass/forb species richness compared to grasslands with less or only one species.

Impact 

Intervention 

Comparator 

Positive 

Negative 

No effect 

Uncertain 

Increase soil biological quality 

Increasing grass/forb species richness 

Low species richness 

4 (4) 

0 

3 (3) 

0 

Increase soil nutrients 

Increasing grass/forb species richness 

Low species richness 

1 (1) 

0 

2 (2) 

0 

Increase carbon sequestration 

Increasing grass/forb species richness 

Low species richness 

1 (1) 

0 

2 (2) 

0 

Increase grassland production 

Increasing grass/forb species richness 

Low species richness 

3 (3) 

0 

0 

0 

 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SIZE OF THE EFFECT

Only the factors explicitly studied in the reviewed synthesis papers with a significant effect are reported below. Details regarding the factors can be found in the Summaries of the meta-analyses. 

Impact 

Factors 

Increase biodiversity 

Interaction between time since treatment and seeding prior to restoration (ref 6), Disturbance prior to restoration (ref 6), N content in amendment (ref 13), N fertiliser application rate (ref 25), Duration of treatment (ref 25), Climate (ref 25), Fertiliser type (ref 25), Geographical area (ref 27), Grassland type (ref 27), Organism (ref 27), Mowing date (ref 27), Historical management (ref 27), Recent management (ref 27), Date of the early cut (ref 30), N application rate (ref 32) 

Decrease ecotoxicity 

N content in amendment (ref 13) 

Decrease GHG emissions 

N fertiliser application rate (ref 18), Excreta type (ref 19), Deposition season (ref 19) 

Decrease nutrient leaching and run- off 

N content in amendment (ref 13), Deposition season (ref 19), Application rate (ref 19), Timing of application (ref 19) 

Increase soil biological quality 

Duration of treatment (ref 23, 29) 

Decrease soil erosion 

Amendment rate (ref 13), N content in amendment (ref 13) 

Increase soil nutrients 

N application rate (ref 21), Climate (ref 21) 

Increase carbon sequestration 

Grass plant species richness (ref 9, 10), Duration of treatment (ref 9, 10), Interaction between grass plant species richness and experimental duration (ref 9), Amendment rate (ref 13), N content in amendment (ref 13), Time between treatment and measurement (ref 13) 

Increase soil water retention 

Duration of treatment (ref 21) 

Increase plant nutrient uptake 

N fertiliser application rate (ref 28) 

Increase grassland production 

Time since treatment (ref 6), Burned before treatment (ref 6), Mean annual temperature (ref 6), Seeding prior to restoration (ref 6), Crop type (ref 8), P fertiliser application rate (ref 8), Climate (ref 8, 21), Soil Olsen P levels (ref 8), Grass plant species richness (ref 9, 10), Duration of treatment (ref 9, 10), Interaction between grass plant species richness and experimental duration (ref 9), Aridity index (ref 10), Plot area (ref 10), Amendment rate (ref 13), Time between treatment and measurement (ref 13), Study type (ref 19), Study duration (ref 19), Timing of application (ref 19), N application rate (ref 21) 

4. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY 

Keywords 

TS=("grazing*" OR "grassland*" OR "pasture*" OR "rangeland")) AND TS=(("meta-analy*" OR "systematic* review*" OR "evidence map" OR "global synthesis" OR "evidence synthesis" OR "research synthesis") 

or 

TITLE-ABS-KEY: ( "grazing*"  OR  "grassland*"  OR  "pasture*"  OR "rangeland")  AND  TITLE-ABS-KEY ( "meta-analy*"  OR  "systematic* review*"  OR  "evidence map"  OR  "global synthesis"  OR  "evidence synthesis"  OR  "research synthesis") 

Search dates 

No time restrictions 

Databases 

Web of Science and Scopus, run in September 2021 

Selection criteria 

The main criteria that led to the exclusion of a synthesis paper were when the paper: 1) does not deal with terrestrial grasslands or the effects on grasslands can not be disentangle from other land uses; 2) does not deal with grassland management, namely soil amendment, soil fertilisation, mowing or increasing plant species richness; 3) is either a non-systematic review, a non-quantitative systematic review, or a meta-regression without mean effect sizes; 4) is not written in English. Due to the high number of potentially valid synthesis papers, we applied additional exclusion criteria: 5) the paper does not include studies conducted in Europe; 6) the paper only reports impacts on crop or animal production, but any environmental impacts. Synthesis papers that passed the relevance criteria were subject to critical appraisal carried out on a paper-by-paper basis. 

The search returned 1022 synthesis papers potentially relevant for the practice object of our fiche. From the 1022 potentially relevant synthesis papers, 661 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and 327 after reading the full text according to the above-mentioned criteria. Finally, 34 synthesis papers were selected for grazing management. 

5. LIST OF SYNTHESIS PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW  

Ref. Num 

Authors 

Year 

Title 

Reference 

DOI 

1 

Chen, J; Feng, M; Cui, Y; Liu, G 

2021 

The impacts of nitrogen addition on upland soil methane uptake: A global meta-analysis 

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 795, 148863. 

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148863 

2 

Chen, XL; Chen, HYH; Searle, EB; Chen, C; Reich, PB 

2021 

Negative to positive shifts in diversity effects on soil nitrogen over time 

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 4, 225–232. 

10.1038/s41893-020-00641-y 

3 

Barry, KE; van Ruijven, J; Mommer, L; Bai, YF; Beierkuhnlein, C; Buchmann, N; de Kroon, H; Ebeling, A; Eisenhauer, N; Guimaraes-Steinicke, C; Hildebrandt, A; Isbell, F; Milcu, A; Nesshover, C; Reich, PB; Roscher, C; Sauheitl, L; Scherer-Lorenzen, M; Schmid, B; Tilman, D; von Felten, S; Weigelt, A 

2020 

Limited evidence for spatial resource partitioning across temperate grassland biodiversity experiments 

ECOLOGY, 101(1), e02905. 

10.1002/ecy.2905 

4 

Chen, XL; Chen, HYH; Chen, C; Ma, ZL; Searle, EB; Yu, ZP; Huang, ZQ 

2020 

Effects of plant diversity on soil carbon in diverse ecosystems: A global meta-analysis 

BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 95(1), 167-183. 

10.1111/brv.12554 

5 

Jia, XY; Zhong, YQW; Liu, J; Zhu, GY; Shangguan, ZP; Yan, WM 

2020 

Effects of nitrogen enrichment on soil microbial characteristics: From biomass to enzyme activities 

GEODERMA, 366, 114256. 

10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114256 

6 

Ploughe, LW; Akin-Fajiye, M; Gagnon, A; Gardner, WC; Fraser, LH 

2020 

Revegetation of degraded ecosystems into grasslands using biosolids as an organic amendment: A meta-analysis 

APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 24(1), e12558. 

10.1111/avsc.12558 

7 

Prather, RM; Castillioni, K; Kaspari, M; Souza, L; Prather, CM; Reihart, RW; Welti, EAR 

2020 

Micronutrients enhance macronutrient effects in a meta-analysis of grassland arthropod abundance 

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 29(12), 2273-2288. 

10.1111/geb.13196 

8 

Ros, MBH; Koopmans, GF; van Groenigen, KJ; Abalos, D; Oenema, O; Vos, HMJ; van Groenigen, JW 

2020 

Towards optimal use of phosphorus fertiliser 

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 10, 17804. 

10.1038/s41598-020-74736-z 

9 

Wang, C; Tang, YJ; Li, XN; Zhang, WW; Zhao, CQ; Li, C 

2020 

Negative impacts of plant diversity loss on carbon sequestration exacerbate over time in grasslands 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 15(10), 104055. 

10.1088/1748-9326/abaf88 

10 

Xu, S; Eisenhauer, N; Ferlian, O; Zhang, JL; Zhou, GY; Lu, XK; Liu, CS; Zhang, DQ 

2020 

Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: Evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments 

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 287, 20202063. 

10.1098/rspb.2020.2063 

11 

Zhang, LH; Yuan, FH; Bai, JH; Duan, HT; Gu, XY; Hou, LY; Huang, Y; Yang, MG; He, JS; Zhang, ZH; Yu, LJ; Song, CC; Lipson, DA; Zona, D; Oechel, W; Janssens, IA; Xu, XF 

2020 

Phosphorus alleviation of nitrogen-suppressed methane sink in global grasslands 

ECOLOGY LETTERS, 23(5), 821-830. 

10.1111/ele.13480 

12 

Chen, C; Chen, HYH; Chen, XL; Huang, ZQ 

2019 

Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration 

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 10, 1332. 

10.1038/s41467-019-09258-y 

13 

Gravuer, K; Gennet, S; Throop, HL 

2019 

Organic amendment additions to rangelands: A meta-analysis of multiple ecosystem outcomes 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 25(3), 1152-1170. 

10.1111/gcb.14535 

14 

Jiang, J; Wang, YP; Yang, YH; Yu, MX; Wang, C; Yan, JH 

2019 

Interactive effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on plant growth vary with ecosystem type 

PLANT AND SOIL, 440(1-2), 523-537. 

10.1007/s11104-019-04119-5 

15 

Midolo, G; Alkemade, R; Schipper, AM; Benitez-Lopez, A; Perring, MP; De Vries, W 

2019 

Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant species richness and abundance: A global meta-analysis 

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 28(3), 398-413. 

10.1111/geb.12856 

16 

Zheng, MH; Zhou, ZH; Luo, YQ; Zhao, P; Mo, JM 

2019 

Global pattern and controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: A meta-analysis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 25(9), 3018-3030. 

10.1111/gcb.14705 

17 

Talle, M; Deak, B; Poschlod, P; Valko, O; Westerberg, L; Milberg, P 

2018 

Similar effects of different mowing frequencies on the conservation value of semi-natural grasslands in Europe 

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 27(10), 2451-2475. 

10.1007/s10531-018-1562-6 

18 

Wang, JY; Chadwick, DR; Cheng, Y; Yan, XY 

2018 

Global analysis of agricultural soil denitrification in response to fertilizer nitrogen 

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 616, 908-917. 

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.229 

19 

Cai, YJ; Akiyama, H 

2017 

Effects of inhibitors and biochar on nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate leaching, and plant nitrogen uptake from urine patches of grazing animals on grasslands: A meta-analysis 

SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 63(4), 405-414. 

10.1080/00380768.2017.1367627 

20 

Chen, J; Luo, YQ; Li, JW; Zhou, XH; Cao, JJ; Wang, RW; Wang, YQ; Shelton, S; Jin, Z; Walker, LM; Feng, ZZ; Niu, SL; Feng, WT; Jian, SY; Zhou, LY 

2017 

Costimulation of soil glycosidase activity and soil respiration by nitrogen addition 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 23(3), 1328-1337. 

10.1111/gcb.13402 

21 

You, CM; Wu, FZ; Gan, YM; Yang, WQ; Hu, ZM; Xu, ZF; Tan, B; Liu, L; Ni, XY 

2017 

Grass and forbs respond differently to nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis of global grassland ecosystems 

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 7, 1563. 

10.1038/s41598-017-01728-x 

22 

Zhou, ZH; Wang, CK; Zheng, MH; Jiang, LF; Luo, YQ 

2017 

Patterns and mechanisms of responses by soil microbial communities to nitrogen addition 

SOIL BIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 115, 433-441. 

10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.09.015 

23 

Geisseler, D; Lazicki, PA; Scow, KM 

2016 

Mineral nitrogen input decreases microbial biomass in soils under grasslands but not annual crops 

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 106, 1-10. 

10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.015 

24 

Gilsanz, C; Baez, D; Misselbrook, TH; Dhanoa, MS; Cardenas, LM 

2016 

Development of emission factors and efficiency of two nitrification inhibitors, DCD and DMPP 

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 216, 1-8. 

10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.030 

25 

Humbert, JY; Dwyer, JM; Andrey, A; Arlettaz, R 

2016 

Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant biodiversity in mountain grasslands depend on dose, application duration and climate: A systematic review 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 22(1), 110-120. 

10.1111/gcb.12986 

26 

Li, Y; Niu, SL; Yu, GR 

2016 

Aggravated phosphorus limitation on biomass production under increasing nitrogen loading: A meta-analysis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 22(2), 934-943. 

10.1111/gcb.13125 

27 

Talle, M; Deak, B; Poschlod, P; Valko, O; Westerberg, L; Milberg, P 

2016 

Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management 

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 222, 200-212. 

10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.008 

28 

Tian, DH; Wang, H; Sun, J; Niu, SL 

2016 

Global evidence on nitrogen saturation of terrestrial ecosystem net primary productivity 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 11(2), 24012. 

10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024012 

29 

Thakur, MP; Milcu, A; Manning, P; Niklaus, PA; Roscher, C; Power, S; Reich, PB; Scheu, S; Tilman, D; Ai, F; Guo, H; Ji, R; Pierce, S; Ramirez, NG; Richter, AN; Steinauer, K; Strecker, T; Vogel, A; Eisenhauer, N 

2015 

Plant diversity drives soil microbial biomass carbon in grasslands irrespective of global environmental change factors 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 21(11), 4076-4085. 

10.1111/gcb.13011 

30 

Humbert, JY; Pellet, J; Buri, P; Arlettaz, R 

2012 

Does delaying the first mowing date benefit biodiversity in meadowland? 

ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 1, 9. 

10.1186/2047-2382-1-9 

31 

Kim, DG; Saggar, S; Roudier, P 

2012 

The effect of nitrification inhibitors on soil ammonia emissions in nitrogen managed soils: A meta-analysis 

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 93(1), 51-64. 

10.1007/s10705-012-9498-9 

32 

De Schrijver, A; De Frenne, P; Ampoorter, E; Van Nevel, L; Demey, A; Wuyts, K; Verheyen, K 

2011 

Cumulative nitrogen input drives species loss in terrestrial ecosystems 

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 20(6), 803-816. 

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00652.x 

33 

Lu, M; Zhou, XH; Luo, YQ; Yang, YH; Fang, CM; Chen, JK; Li, B 

2011 

Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis 

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT,140(1-2), 234-244. 

10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.010 

34 

Akiyama, H; Yan, XY; Yagi, K 

2010 

Evaluation of effectiveness of enhanced-efficiency fertilizers as mitigation options for N2O and NO emissions from agricultural soils: Meta-analysis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 16(6) 1837-1846. 

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02031.x 

[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results.

[2] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Shrubland

[3] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Grassland

[4] Diacono, M, and Montemurro, F. 2010. Long‐term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 401–422.

  • No labels