Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
HTML
<div class="banner_general_fiche"><div class="table-wrap"><table class="ficheTable" style="width: 99.1985%;"><colgroup><col style="width: 60%;"><col style="width: 20%;"></colgroup><tbody><tr><td class="confluenceTd"><h1 style="text-align: center;" title="" id="banner_title"></h1></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>


<script>
var title = $('#title-text').find('a').text();
var mytitle = title.replace('_',' ');
$('#banner_title').text(mytitle + ' Fiche');

</script>

<style>
.banner_general_fiche { 
  height: 194px;  
  padding-right: 20px;
  background-color: #00afef;
 }
.banner_general_fiche h1 {
  position: relative;
  font-size: 1.7 !important;
  font-family: corbel;
  color: #ffffff !important;
  letter-spacing: -0.01em;
  font-weight: normal;
  line-height: 1.25;
  top: 64px;
  font-weight: bold;
  margin-left: 30px;
}
#banner_title {
   text-transform: uppercase; 
}
.table-wrap {
    overflow-x: hidden;
    overflow-y: hidden;
}
.banner_general_fiche td { 
    border: 0px !important;
	height: 170px;
	width: 100%;
}  
.content-wrapper {
  font-family: corbel;
  position: relative;
}
</style>

<style>
.highlight-green {
   color: #000000;
   background-color: #92d050 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-green>p {
    background-color: #92d050 !important;
}
.highlight-red {
   color: #000000 !important;
   background-color: #ff0000 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-red>p {
    background-color: #ff0000 !important;
}
.highlight-yellow {
   color: #000000;
   background-color: #ffc000 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-yellow>p {
    background-color: #ffc000 !important;
}
.highlight-grey {
   color: #000000 !important;
   background-color: #a4a4a4 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-grey>p {
    background-color: #a4a4a4 !important;
}

#Agroforestry_GENERAL-GENERALFICHE-AGROFORESTRY {
  color: #F8F8FF !important;

}
#main-content { font-family: corbel; }

.wiki-content img.confluence-embedded-image { cursor: default !important;}  

</style>

Data extracted in April 2021 February 2021
Fiche created in May 2024

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises all the environmental and climate impacts of SOIL AMENDMENT WITH LIME OR AND GYPSUM found in a systematic review of 7 synthesis research papers[1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 35 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4.    . The impacts reported here are those for which there is scientific evidence available in published synthesis papers, what does not preclude the farming practice to have other impacts on the environment and climate still not covered by primary studies or by synthesis papers.

The synthesis papers review As each synthesis research paper involves a number of primary research papers studies ranging from 19 to 175. Therefore, the assessment of impacts relies on a large number of results from the primary studies, obtained mainly in field experiments (carried out in situations close to real farming environment), and conditions, or sometimes in lab experiments or from model simulations.  

1.     DESCRIPTION OF THE FARMING PRACTICE

...

  • Description:
    • Soil amendments are the practices used to improve the soil quality in terms of its structure and biochemical function. Most amendments use calcium-containing minerals, such as lime or gypsum. Both types of amendment

...

    • have different chemical properties, as explained in Key descriptors.

...

  • Key descriptors

...

  • :
    • Different types of calcium-containing minerals are used in practice, in particular

...

    • :[3]
    • Lime refers to a material that can come in different forms, especially calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and magnesium carbonate (MgCO3). It is used to reduce soil acidity and to add calcium or magnesium to the soil. [4]
    • Gypsum, or calcium sulfate dihydrate, (CaSO4 ·2H₂O), is a neutral salt. It can be used to improve soil calcium and sulphur levels. Gypsum is about 200 times more soluble than agricultural lime, allowing it to move readily down the soil profile where it can help to alleviate a range of subsoil problems. In some acid soils, gypsum can be used to ameliorate subsoil aluminium toxicity, while in saline alkaline soils to alleviate sodium toxicity and to regulate soil pH, bulk density and water infiltration. 
    • NA

2.

...

    EFFECTS OF THE FARMING PRACTICE ON

...

CLIMATE AND

...

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

(table 1)

The table below shows

...

We reviewed the impacts of soil amendment with lime or gypsum vs. no amendment. 

The tables below show the number of synthesis papers with statistical tests reporting positive, negative or no effect, based on the statistical comparison of the intervention and the controli) a significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator, that is to say, a significant statistical effect, which can be positive or negative; or ii) a non-statistically significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator. In addition, we include, if any, the number of systematic reviews synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects (uncertain). The numbers between parenthesis indicate the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50%. Details on quality criteria . Details on the quality assessment of the synthesis papers can be found in the methodology section of this WIKI. 

Among Out of the 7 selected synthesis papers, 2 included experiments studies conducted in Europe, and 6 have a quality score higher than 50%.

Table 1: Summary of effects. Number of synthesis papers reporting positive, negative or non-statistically significant effects on environmental and climate impacts. The number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects are also provided. When not all the synthesis papers reporting an effect are of high quality, the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50% is indicated in parentheses. Some synthesis papers reported may report effects for more than one impact, or more than one effect for the same impact.

 

Impact 

 

Intervention 

 

Control 

 

Positive  

Negative  

No effect  

Uncertain  

Increase carbon sequestration 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

1 (1)  

0 

0 

0 

Lime  

No lime  

0 

0 

1 (1)  

0 

Decrease ecotoxicity 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

0 

1 (1)  

1 (1)  

0 

Lime  

No lime  

1 (1)  

0 

0 

0 

Decrease GHG emissions 

Lime  

No lime  

0 

0 

0 

1 (1)  

Increase soil biological quality 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

1 (1)  

0 

0 

0 

Increase soil nutrients 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

0 

0 

1 (1)  

0 

Improve soil physico-chemical quality 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

1 (1)  

0 

0 

0 

Lime  

No lime  

2 (2)  

0 

0 

0 

Increase crop yield 

Gypsum  

No gypsum  

2 (2)  

0 

0 

1 (0)  

Lime  

No lime  

2 (2)  

0 

0 

0 

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SIZE OF THE EFFECT

...

Statistically tested

Non-statistically tested

Impact

Metric

Intervention

Comparator

 Significantly positive

Significantly negative

Non-significant

Increase Carbon sequestration

Soil organic carbon

Gypsum

No gypsum

1

0

0

0

Lime

No lime

0

0

1

0

Decrease GHG emissions

yield-scaled aggregated GHGs emissions (as CO2eq)

Lime

No lime

1

0

1

0

Decrease Heavy metals pollution

Bioavailability and plant uptake of toxic compounds

Gypsum

No gypsum

0

1

1

0

Lime

No lime

1

0

0

0

Increase Soil biological quality

Soil biological quality

Gypsum

No gypsum

1

0

0

0

Increase Soil nutrients

Soil nutrients

Gypsum

No gypsum

0

0

1

0

Increase Soil physico-chemical quality

Soil physical-chemical quality

Gypsum

No gypsum

1

0

0

0

Lime

No lime

2

0

0

0

Increase Crop yield

Crop yield

Gypsum

No gypsum

2

0

0

1 (0)

Lime

No lime

2

0

0

0

3.     FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTS ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The factors significantly influencing the size and/or direction of the effects on the impacts, according to the synthesis papers included in this review, are reported below. Details about

...

the factors can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses

...

Impact  

...

Factors  

...

Soil physico-chemical quality  

...

Incorporation depth (ref 2), Liming rate (ref 3, 5), Lab/field scale (ref 3, 5), Soil salinity (ref 2), Soil organic matter (ref 5), Soil texture (ref 5), Time scale (ref 5),  

...

Carbon sequestration 

...

Application season (ref 2), Climate (ref 6), Liming duration (ref 6), Soil salinity (ref 2), Soil depth (ref 2)  

...

Ecotoxicity  

...

Liming rate (ref 3), Rice cultivar (ref 3), Lab/field scale (ref 3), Soil Cd concentration (ref 3), Soil texture (ref 3), Soil Zn concentration (ref 3), Type of lime (ref 3) 

...

Crop yield  

...

Aluminium saturation (ref 4), Crop species (ref 4, 5), Incorporation depth (ref 2), Irrigation (ref 2), Ploughing (ref 5), Soil texture (ref 5), Soil pH (ref 1), Water table (ref 2), Water deficiency (ref 4) 

available in this WIKI.

Table 2: List of factors reported to significantly affect the size and/or direction of the effects on environmental and climate impacts, according to the synthesis papers reviewed. The reference number of the synthesis papers where those factors are explored is given in parentheses.

Impact

Factors

Carbon sequestration

Aplication season (Ref3), Climate (Ref6), Liming duration (Ref6), NA (Ref6, Ref6, Ref6, Ref6, Ref6, Ref6, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3), Soil depth (Ref3) and Soil salinity (Ref3)

GHG emissions

NA (Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2 and Ref2)

Heavy metals pollution

Liming rate (Ref1), NA (Ref1, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3), Rice cultivar (Ref1), Scale of experiment (Ref1), Soil Cd concentration (Ref1), Soil texture (Ref1), Soil Zn concentration (Ref1) and Type of lime (Ref1)

Soil biological quality

NA (Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3 and Ref3)

Soil nutrients

NA (Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3 and Ref3)

Soil physico-chemical quality

Incorporation depth (Ref3), Liming rate (Ref1, Ref5), NA (Ref1, Ref1, Ref1, Ref1, Ref1, Ref1, Ref5, Ref5, Ref5, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3), Scale of experiment (Ref1, Ref5), Soil organic matter (Ref5), Soil salinity (Ref3), Soil texture (Ref5) and Time scale (Ref5)

Crop yield

Al saturation (Ref4), Crop species (Ref5, Ref4), Incorporation depth (Ref3), Irrigation (Ref3), NA (Ref5, Ref5, Ref5, Ref5, Ref5, Ref4, Ref4, Ref4, Ref4, Ref4, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref2, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref7, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3, Ref3), Plowing (Ref5), Soil pH (Ref2), Soil texture (Ref5), Water deficiency (Ref4) and Water table (Ref3)

4.    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY

Table 3: Systematic review search strategy - methodology and search parameters.

Parameter

Details

Keywords

WOS:

4. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY 

Keywords  

Search equations WOS 

TOPIC: ("liming" OR "limest*" OR "chalk*" OR "marl*" OR "gypsum") AND TOPIC: (soil) AND TOPIC: ("meta-analy*" OR "systematic* review*" OR "evidence map" OR "global synthesis" OR "evidence synthesis" OR "research synthesis")

 



 and

Search equations


SCOPUS

 

: TITLE-ABS-

KEY

KEY (

 (

 "liming"

  OR  

  OR  "limest*"

  OR  

  OR  "chalk*"

  OR  

  OR  "marl*"

  OR  

  OR  "gypsum"

 )

)  AND  TITLE

 )  AND  TITLE-ABS-

KEY(soil)  AND  TITLE

KEY ( soil )  AND  TITLE-ABS-

KEY

KEY (

 (

 "meta-analy*"

  OR  

  OR  "systematic* review*"

  OR  

  OR  "evidence map"

  OR  

  OR  "global synthesis"

  OR  

  OR  "evidence synthesis"

  OR  

  OR  "research synthesis"

 )

 )

 

Time reference

 

Search dates  

No time

restrictions 

restriction.

Databases

 Databases  

Web of Science and Scopus

, run in March 2021  Selection criteria  

: run on 01 February 2021

Exclusion criteria

The main criteria that led to the exclusion of a synthesis paper

were if the paper: (1) was

are: 
 1) The topic of the meta-analysis is out of the scope

; (2) was not

of this review., 2) The paper is neither a systematic review nor a meta-analysis

; (

of primary research., 3)

was a MA

The paper presented a statistical analyisis of experimental trials

(i.e. no

without a systematic review process

); (

, 4)

did not deal with soil amendment with lime or gypsum; (5)

The analysis is not based on pairwise comparisons, 5) The paper is not written in English., 6) The full text is not available and 7) The paper did not deal with environmental or productivity outcome

; (6) did not clearly stated the intervention and comparator treatments; (7) was not written in English. Synthesis papers that passed the relevance criteria were subject to critical appraisal carried out on paper-by-paper basis

.

 

The

systematic

search

provided 35 synthesis papers (after removing the duplicates)

returned 29 synthesis papers from WOS and SCOPUS on Soil amendment with lime and gypsum plus other 6 retrieved in the search of other farming practices, potentially relevant for the practice object of our

fiches

fiche. 
From

this set of

the  potentially relevant synthesis papers

, 7

, 13 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and 4 after reading the full text according to the above-mentioned criteria. Finally, 7 synthesis papers were selected.

 

5.

...

     SYNTHESIS PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE

...

REVIEW

Table 4: List of synthesis papers included in this review. More details can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses.

Ref Num

Author(s)

Year

Title

Journal

DOI

Ref1

Kong L, Guo Z, Peng C, Xiao X, He Y

2021

Factors influencing the effectiveness of liming on cadmium reduction in rice: A meta-analysis and decision tree analysis

Sci Total Environ. 779:146477

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146477

Ref2

R.Hijbeek; M.P.van Loon; W.Ouaret; B.Boekelo; M.K.van Ittersum

2021

...

Ref. Num 

Authors 

Year 

Title 

Reference 

DOI 

1 

Hijbeek R, van Loon MP, Ouaret W, Boekelo B, van Ittersum MK 

2021  

Liming agricultural soils in Western Kenya: Can long-term economic and environmental benefits pay off short term investments?

  

Agricultural Systems 190,

103095  

103095

10.1016/j.agsy.2021.

103095  

103095

2 

Ref3

Wang Y, Wang Z, Liang F, Jing X, Feng

 

W

2021  

2021

Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum improves multiple functions of saline-sodic soils across China.

  

Chemosphere. 277:

130345  

130345

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.

130345  

3 

Kong L, Guo Z, Peng C, Xiao X, He Y  

2021  

Factors influencing the effectiveness of liming on cadmium reduction in rice: A meta-analysis and decision tree analysis  

Sci Total Environ. 779:146477  

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146477  

4 

130345

Ref4

Pias, OHD; Tiecher, T; Cherubin, MR; Silva, AGB; Bayer,

 

C

2020  

2020

Does gypsum increase crop grain yield on no-tilled acid soils? A meta-

analysis  

analysis

Agronomy Journal 112, 675–692.

  

10.1002/agj2.

20125  

20125

5 

Ref5

Li Y.; Cui S.; Chang S.X., Zhang Q.

  

2019  

2019

Liming effects on soil pH and crop yield depend on lime material type, application method and rate, and crop species: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments 19(4)

  

J Soils Sediments 19:

1393–406  

1393–406

10.1007/s11368-018-2120-

 

2

6 

Ref6

Eze, S; Palmer, SM; Chapman, PJ.

  

2018  

2018

Soil organic carbon stock in grasslands: Effects of inorganic fertilizers, liming and grazing in different climate

settings  

settings

Journal of Environmental Management 223, 74-

84  

84

10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.

013  

013

7 

Ref7

Tiecher, T; Pias, OHD; Bayer, C; Martins, AP; Denardin, LGD; Anghinoni,

 

I

2018  

2018

Crop Response to Gypsum Application to Subtropical Soils Under No-Till in Brazil: a Systematic

Review  

Review

Revista Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo 42:

170025  

170025

10.1590/

18069657rbcs20170025  

18069657rbcs20170025

 

Disclaimer: These fiches present a large amount of scientific knowledge synthesised to assess farming practices impacts on the environment, climate and productivity. The European Commission maintains this WIKI to enhance public access to information about its initiatives. Our goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will try to correct them. However, the Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information on these fiches and WIKI.


[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results. Details can be found in the methodology section of the WIKI.

[2] https://agbmps.osu.edu/bmp/amending-soils-lime-or-gypsum-nrcs-333

[3] https://www.kzndard.gov.za/images/Documents/researchandtechnologydevelopment/publications/researchreports/2015_13_Agricultural_uses_of_lime_and_gypsum.pdf

[4] http://www.gypsoil.com/news-and-events/gypsum-and-lime