Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises the environmental and climate impacts of GRASSLAND CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION found in a systematic review of 10 synthesis research papers [1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 1022 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4. 

...

Description  

  • Grasslands are areas of land predominantly covered by communities of grass-like plants and forbs and may include sparsely occurring trees and shrubs. In the Eurostat classification, percentages of area covered by such canopies are limited to less than 10 % in the case of trees and to less than 20 % in the case of shrubs (i.e., low woody plants capable of reaching heights of up to 5 metresmetres [2]) or shrubs and trees togethertogether [3]. However, in the scientific literature reviewed here, grasslands are usually more broadly defined and might not fully meet such canopy limits. 
  • This review includes a wide variety of grassland types: savannah, grassy deserts, seasonally flooded grasslands, prairies, meadows, pastures, rangelands, salt-marshes, bioenergy perennial grasslands, calcareous grasslands and wooded grasslands. Grasslands differ in terms of: 
  • management intensity: natural, semi-natural, improved and intensively managed, 
  • management history: permanent and temporary, 
  • successional stage: old successional and secondary grasslands, 
  • biomes and climates: semi-arid, temperate, tropical, Mediterranean, tundra, alpine, subalpine, artic and subartic. 
  • Fodder crops are not included as grasslands. 
  • Grassland conservation refers to the preservation (i.e., no transformation to other land uses) of old successional natural grasslands. Old successional natural grasslands are grasses and forbs communities with no major human-induced structural or functional alterations so that their current management closely resembles historical, endogenous disturbance regimes (e.g., grazing intensity and fire frequency) [4]. In the scientific literature, these ecosystems are also referred as old-growth, ancient, remnant or native grasslands. 
  • Grassland restoration includes active and passive restoration methods usually aiming at enhancing plant community diversity, what is then expected to have cascading positive effects in higher trophic levels5. This review includes several restoration methods: sowing of seed mixtures, addition of soil and hay, reintroduction of grazing and burning as active restoration methods, and abandonment of agricultural use as passive restoration method. In this review, we only consider the restoration of former grassland areas degraded by agricultural use (i.e., degradation due to mining or other land uses are excluded). We define secondary grasslands as the herbaceous communities that assemble after destruction (here, by agricultural use) of old successional natural grasslandsgrasslands [4] where the restoration efforts are conducted. 

Key descriptors  

  • For the exploration of grassland conservation, this review includes the spatial comparison between preserved old successional natural grasslands (intervention) and nearby secondary grasslands, either restored or degraded, as control. 
  • For the exploration of grassland restoration, this review includes spatial and temporal comparisons between restored grasslands (intervention) and croplands or secondary grasslands after crop abandonment as controls. Spatial comparisons are those conducted simultaneously between restored grasslands and nearby croplands (or secondary grasslands after crop abandonment). Temporal comparisons are those conducted in the same site before (when land use was cropland or abandoned cropland) and after restoration into grassland. 
  • In this review, grassland restoration includes restoration into different types of grasslands, including perennial bioenergy grasslands. 
  • This review does not include grazing or other management practices (i.e, soil amendment and fertilisation, mowing, increasing grass species richness) conducted in grasslands, which are assessed in separate sets of fiches. 

 

 

...

Ref. Num 

Authors 

Year 

Title 

Reference 

DOI 

1 

Zhang, YS; Pan, BB; Lam, SK; Bai, E; Hou, PF; Chen, DL 

2021 

Predicting the ratio of nitrification to immobilization to reflect the potential risk of nitrogen loss worldwide 

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 55(11), 7721-7730. 

10.1021/acs.est.0c08514 

2 

Nerlekar, AN; Veldman, JW 

2020 

High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands 

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 117(31), 18550-18556. 

10.1073/pnas.1922266117 

3 

Sexton, AN; Emery, SM 

2020 

Grassland restorations improve pollinator communities: A meta-analysis 

JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 24(4), 719-726. 

10.1007/s10841-020-00247-x 

4 

Wu, JJ; Chen, Q; Jia, W; Long, CY; Liu, WZ; Liu, GH; Cheng, XL 

2020 

Asymmetric response of soil methane uptake rate to land degradation and restoration: Data synthesis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 26(11), 6581-6593. 

10.1111/gcb.15315 

5 

Kampf, I; Holzel, N; Storrle, M; Broll, G; Kiehl, K 

2016 

Potential of temperate agricultural soils for carbon sequestration: A meta-analysis of land-use effects 

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 566, 428-435. 

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.067 

6 

Harris, ZM; Spake, R; Taylor, G 

2015 

Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions 

BIOMASS AND BIOENERGY, 82, 27-39. 

10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.008 

7 

MacDonald, GK; Bennett, EM; Taranu, ZE 

2012 

The influence of time, soil characteristics, and land-use history on soil phosphorus legacies: A global meta-analysis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 18(6), 553-565. 

10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02653.x 

8 

Felton, A; Knight, E; Wood, J; Zammit, C; Lindenmayer, D 

2010 

A meta-analysis of fauna and flora species richness and abundance in plantations and pasture lands 

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 143(3), 545-554. 

10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.030 

9 

Attwood, SJ; Maron, M; House, APN; Zammit, C 

2008 

Do arthropod assemblages display globally consistent responses to intensified agricultural land use and management? 

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 17(5), 585-599. 

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00399.x 

10 

Guo, LB; Gifford, RM 

2002 

Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis 

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 8(4), 345-360. 

10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x 

[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results.

[2] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Shrubland

[3]  https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Grassland

[4] Nerlekar & Veldman. 2020. High plant diversity and slow assembly of old-growth grasslands. PNAS 117, 18550–18556.