Welcome
This page explains the basic functionalities and common elements for all assessments in Assessment module for expert, consolidator and/or editing assignments, and for all assessment types (application, interim report and final report), unless specified otherwise.
The term assessment is used throughout this page and covers expert assessments, and consolidation as well as editing assignments, unless specified otherwise.
Take note
The assessments contain onscreen notifications and warning messages specific to the assessment you are working on. Please read the information carefully and, if you require further assistance, consult the relevant 'How to' pages for experts.
In addition, tooltips and/or guidelines are available which are clearly indicated by a question mark icon in a black circle . Clicking on the icon will open the related guidelines pop-up window.
For an overview of the assessment process, see page Expert Assessment.
For a list of all available wiki pages regarding expert assessments, see Assessment module for experts - Index.
After opening one of the given assignments from My Assessments, the related Assessment Details screen opens in a new tab. The following elements are available:
Includes the content of the assessment as per assignment. By default, the Award criteria screen is displayed.
Take note
If you need to make changes in an already submitted assessment, please contact your National Agency. If changes are considered necessary, the National Agency will request a new version of the assessment. This new version of the assessment will then be available from My Assessments, clearly indicating the version as v02, v03,... etc.
Here is an example screen of an expanded header of a consolidation assignment that reached the award criteria thresholds. It also displays the scores given by each expert involved in the assessment per award criteria, in our example we have the information available for Expert1, Expert2, and the Consolidator.
Here is an example screen of an expanded header of a not-started or ongoing expert assignment.
The PDF (Print) button on the top right corner of the screen is always active and can be used to create PDF files of drafted and completed assessments.
The file download begins automatically and a success message displays.
If a draft, meaning not submitted, version of an assessment is exported as a PDF, it will indicate its draft status.
To access a specific section within an assessment, use the Navigation panel.
Information
It is possible to scroll independently through the navigation menu, the work area as a whole, and the available panels of the work area.
The navigation panel also shows which sections of the assessment are complete by displaying a green check, or incomplete by displaying a red X. The panel can be collapsed, using the available arrow <.
In Editing assignments the sections are by default marked with a green check.
Mandatory fields and questions in an assessment are marked with a red asterisk *. They must be filled in before you are able to submit the assessment results.
If a section in the Navigation is marked with a red X, it means that mandatory information is missing or incomplete.
Project results in a final report assessment are available in the dedicated tab in the Assessment details Project information section.
Project results, if applicable for a project, are uploaded and submitted in the Project Results Platform by beneficiaries after the submission of the final beneficiary report or when the end date of a project has been reached. The responsible NA officer in the project results platform will then be able to review the submitted results and can either approve them or send them back to the beneficiary for modifications.
The results can be viewed and downloaded by the experts during the assessment of the final report.
The Editors have access to project results only when the Editor Assignment Status is Reviewing (read-only) or "Editing cancelled (Reviewing read-only)".
If no results have been received, the Project results screen in the Assessment details will not contain any information.
Please consult the page Project results in Final report assessments for details.
When accessing the Award Criteria section, the content area will either open the corresponding assignment in read or edit mode, depending on your role and the assignment status.
The assessment is opened in a specific tab for your role. You will see the tabs for other expert(s) involved in the assessment process. Depending on your role and the status of the assignment, you may or may not have access to the information for each of the available tabs.
Here is an example of the tabs displayed under Award Criteria for Expert1 of a project assessment with two experts assigned to evaluate. The tabs for Expert2 and Consolidator are greyed out. Expert1 does not have access to these.
Take note
Only the expert tabs for experts that are were selected to participate in the consolidation by the National Agency can be accessed by the consolidator. If an expert was excluded from the consolidation, the relevant expert tab is displayed, but not accessible.
Please also consult the specifics for ESC50 Quality Label call 2022, ESC50 Quality Label call 2023, KA171-HED projects and Final Report assessments for KA220 Call 2022 onward.
See below for information on the character limits in comments fields.
The Conflict of interest section is available for expert assignments. It is here that the expert will have to confirm if a conflict of interest exists. A negative conflict of interest statement is required to be able to submit an assessment.
In case of a Conflict of interest you cannot perform the given assignment. In the Assessment Details screen click Conflict of interest in the Navigation panel. Then check the option I declare conflict of interest.
The Approval section of an assessment allows the expert assigned as Consolidator to declare the consolidated version of the assessment ready for approval by the other experts involved in the consolidation process, if applicable. Consolidators can access this section directly from My Assessments by selecting Submit for expert`s approval from the actions button of the consolidator assignment.
Experts participating in the consolidation process will declare their approval of the consolidation also in this screen. Experts that are required to give approval can access the Approval section directly from My Assessments by selecting Approve consolidation from the actions button of the related expert assignment.
This example shows the Approval section in a consolidator assignment. The consolidator requested the approval from the other expert involved in the consolidation and is Pending Approval.
Editors have access to the Approval section of the assessment when the assignment status is "Reviewing (Read only)" or "Editing cancelled (Reviewing read-only)". Editors can access the Approval section after clicking on the Consolidator tab in the Award Criteria.
Click the ? icon next to the Assessment details to open the guidelines. Here you find information and links to further help you complete the assessment. Click the Close button to close the guidelines window.
Your actions may also trigger certain information and/or warning messages. Read those notifications and messages carefully.
The Quality Label can be requested for the Host and/or Support role. In addition to these, an organisation can also apply for Lead role. During assessment, the expert will have to assess each role the organisation applies for. The page How to assess applications for ESC50 - Quality Label provides detailed information and step-by-step instructions for the completion of ESC50 - Quality Label assessments.
The header in the Assessment Details screen displays basic information about the Quality Label application under assessment. By default, it only shows key details. To expand and view further information, click the available down arrow.
This example shows the header for an ongoing ESC50 - Quality Label application assessment where the organisation applies for Host, Support and Lead role.
This example shows the header for an ongoing ESC50 - Quality Label application assessment where the organisation applies for Host and Lead role. The organisation already holds a Quality Label for Support role from call year 2020. In the expert column, the Support role is marked with ✔ Awarded.
This example shows the header for a completed consolidation for an ESC50 - Quality Label application.
For the Host and Support role, the assessment is not based on points and therefore each Award Criteria must simply be marked as either Acceptable or Not Acceptable.
For the Lead role, the assessment is based on points and therefore you must provide scores for each Award Criteria.
Organisations can apply for the Quality label for the Host, Support and Lead organisation roles. Organisations applying for the Host and/or Support role and the Lead role from call year 2023 onward be assessed by experts in two sequential processes:
The project code displayed in My Assessments for the ESC50 2023 assessments will display a suffixed indication of the quality role(s) requested (H and/or S, and L), for example:
The header of the Assessment details will display the requested role(s) and, where applicable, information on role(s) attained in a previous year.
Here is an example of the header in the Assignment Details of an application for the Host and Support role.
Here is an example of the header in the Assignment Details of an application for the Support role, where the organisation attained a Quality Label for the Host role in a previous year.
The Navigation Menu in the Assessment details for an ESC50 - Quality Label application for Host and/or Support role from call year 2023 onward consists of:
Conflict of interest - experts must confirm that they have no conflict of interest with respect to the assessment of the particular application in this section.
The Conflict of interest section is not available in the consolidator and/or editor assignments for the Host/Support role assessment.
Information
If there is a conflict of interest, the expert does not have to fill in the various sections of the assessment, and can declare the conflict of interest directly in this section.
When opened from My Assessments, an assessment always displays the Project Information by default. The information available here is relevant for the given assignment.
Available subsections under Project Information for ESC50 include Application, Budget information, and Assessments, once the assessment was submitted, with the same functionalities as explained above such as Download PDF, See PDF online and See Application Details.
When accessing the Award criteria of the Host/Support role assessment, subtabs within the expert specific tab are displayed, one per requested role. During the assessment, you must complete the required information per role within each available subtab.
If the organisation applies, for example, for both the Host and Support role, the Award criteria (1) screen shows two subtabs that both must be completed.
In this case, an information message (2) is displayed, informing you of the fact that the award criterion Relevance is considered a common criteria for both the host and support role, and that the information provided for this criterion in the assessment of one role (comment and decision) will be automatically transferred into the relevant fields for this criterion for the other role to assess.
This example shows the available subtabs for an application for Host and Support role, including the information message.
Assessments for the Host/Support role are not score, but decision based, allowing you to select a decision (3) for each available criteria:
You must select an option (acceptable or not acceptable) for each award criterion
In an assessment for Host and Support role, after providing the comment for the award criterion Relevance for the selected role, a pop-up window will display, informing you of the fact that this criterion is common for both the host and support role assessment. The information provided in the Relevance comments field for the Host role, will be copied into the assessment for the Support role.
Click on OK in the pop-up to confirm. Clicking on Cancel will result in the information in the comment field of this criterion being removed.
Any changes you make in the comment field of this criterion for one role will result in the confirmation pop-up being displayed and the information being transferred when confirmed. The same pop-up will display when you provide the decision for this criterion and when working on the consolidation for these application assessments.
For detailed information and step-by-step instructions, please see page How to assess applications for ESC50 Quality Label 2023 for the Host and Support role.
The Navigation menu in the Assessment Details for a Lead role assessment does not contain the Site Visit option, as this is not applicable for these assessments.
Available subsections under Project Information include Application, Budget information, and Assessments.
In the case where an organisation applied for the Host/Support and the Lead role, the Assessments section may contain the PDF versions of the assessment of the Host and/or Support role, if the assessment for the related Host and/or Support role application (for the same year) was completed and accepted by the NA, with at least one role awarded.
It provides access to the individual expert assessments, consolidator assessment and, if applicable, edited version of the consolidated assessment. You can:
For detailed information and step-by-step instructions, please see page How to assess applications for ESC50 Quality Label 2023 for the Lead role.
KA171-HED - Mobility of higher education students and staff supported by external policy funds support physical and blended mobility of higher education students and staff from/to third countries not associated to Erasmus+. The page How to assess KA171-HED projects provides detailed information and step-by-step instructions for the completion of these assessments.
Here an example for the expanded header in a completed expert assignment for a KA171-HED project, in which one region did not pass the required threshold.
Here an example for the expanded header in a completed consolidator assignment for a KA171-HED project. All regions were assessed and reached the required threshold.
Here an example of the Award criteria in which the General Questions have been scored. The Total score under the selected regional tab initially displays the score calculated using the score(s) provided for the General Questions of the Award criteria. As no scores are yet given for the regional award criteria, the calculated total score displays in orange.
Here an example of the Award criteria regional tabs after completion where for all regions to be assessed the required threshold was reached.
Here an example for the display of a regional tab if the required threshold was not reached. A red X displays on the tab and the calculated Total score is displayed in red.