Tool 7 consists of two matrices allowing a capacity development intervention to be weighted and sequenced.
Based on the output of previous tools, Tool 7 enables assessment of the complexity of capacity development needs, and translates this complexity into incremental, properly sequenced steps.
The tool is relevant in the design phase, immediately prior to implementation, and has to be monitored and updated during the implementation phase.
The tool proposes a three-step process.
Step 1: Assess the complexity of capacity development objectives. The first step consists of assessing the intervention's capacity development objectives, specifically:
This step allows estimation of the level of logistic, organisational or political support needed. Table 1 provides an example for an education system showing complexity levels and the frequency and scope of user contact required.
Table 1: Example of complexity and contact levels in capacity development processes
Contact level | Low complexity, high specificity of services | High complexity, low specificity of services |
Little contact with users required | Computerised teacher payroll system | Fiscal/monetary policy management |
Intense contact with users required | School lunch programme; immunisation campaign | Classroom teaching quality, agricultural extension services |
Step 2: Assess capacity development and change intervention options. Step 2 introduces a matrix where options can be assessed from different perspectives – functional-rational versus political – and in terms of both demand and supply sides. The resulting options should not be considered mutually exclusive.
Table 2: Four complementary options for a capacity development intervention
Predominantly functional-rational perspective | Predominantly political perspective | |
Internal elements: SUPPLY SIDE | Focus on getting the job done | Focus on getting power, loyalties and incentives right |
Context or external stakeholders and factors:DEMAND SIDE | Focus on creating an enabling regulatory and supervisory environment | Focus on increasing external pressure for performance |
Step 3: Develop scoping and sequencing options. Based on the previous steps, a scoping and sequencing plan can be designed and graphically represented. The overall capacity development intervention is thus broken down in terms of its overall complexity, with each component serving as the baseline for the subsequent one.
Finally, all of the information collected through Tool 7 can be merged into a summary matrix.
Data/information. Most of the data/information will be in house, as Tool 7 builds on information gathered by the other tools in the toolkit.
Time. The tool is a practical instrument to support capacity development intervention design and implementation. The time required will largely depend on the complexity of the intervention, the quality of previous analysis and effective monitoring capacity.
Skills. Good analytical skills.
Facilities and materials. If a participatory workshop/meeting takes place: appropriate venue, flipcharts, cards, markers, etc., will be needed.
Financial costs and sources. If external expertise is required, funds should be made available to cover the costs associated with fees, travel expenses and logistics. These funds may come from the project itself or through other EC instruments such as a framework contract or a technical cooperation facility.
Tips and tricks
Tool 7 provides a summary of information identified and assessed by other tools. In some cases, it may not be necessary to formally complete the matrix but rather to check that all key elements have been considered and that these will inform formulation of the intervention.
The European Commission (EC), 2010. EuropeAid. Tools and Methods Series. Reference Document N. 6 Toolkit for Capacity Development