<div class="banner_general_fiche"><div class="table-wrap"><table class="ficheTable" style="width: 99.1985%;"><colgroup><col style="width: 60%;"><col style="width: 20%;"></colgroup><tbody><tr><td class="confluenceTd"><h1 style="text-align: center;" title="" id="banner_title"></h1></td></tr></tbody></table></div></div>


<script>
var title = $('#title-text').find('a').text();
var mytitle = title.replace('_',' ');
$('#banner_title').text(mytitle + ' Fiche');

</script>

<style>
.banner_general_fiche { 
  height: 194px;  
  padding-right: 20px;
  background-color: #00afef;
 }
.banner_general_fiche h1 {
  position: relative;
  font-size: 1.7 !important;
  font-family: corbel;
  color: #ffffff !important;
  letter-spacing: -0.01em;
  font-weight: normal;
  line-height: 1.25;
  top: 64px;
  font-weight: bold;
  margin-left: 30px;
}
#banner_title {
   text-transform: uppercase; 
}
.table-wrap {
    overflow-x: hidden;
    overflow-y: hidden;
}
.banner_general_fiche td { 
    border: 0px !important;
	height: 170px;
	width: 100%;
}  
.content-wrapper {
  font-family: corbel;
  position: relative;
}
</style>

<style>
.highlight-green {
   color: #000000;
   background-color: #92d050 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-green>p {
    background-color: #92d050 !important;
}
.highlight-red {
   color: #000000 !important;
   background-color: #ff0000 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-red>p {
    background-color: #ff0000 !important;
}
.highlight-yellow {
   color: #000000;
   background-color: #ffc000 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-yellow>p {
    background-color: #ffc000 !important;
}
.highlight-grey {
   color: #000000 !important;
   background-color: #a4a4a4 !important;
}
table.confluenceTable td.confluenceTd.highlight-grey>p {
    background-color: #a4a4a4 !important;
}

#Agroforestry_GENERAL-GENERALFICHE-AGROFORESTRY {
  color: #F8F8FF !important;

}
#main-content { font-family: corbel; }

.wiki-content img.confluence-embedded-image { cursor: default !important;}  

</style>

Data extracted in January 2022
Fiche created in February 2024

Note to the reader: This general fiche summarises all the environmental and climate impacts of COVER AND CATCH CROPS found in a review of 40 synthesis papers[1]. These papers were selected from an initial number of 158 obtained through a systematic literature search strategy, according to the inclusion criteria reported in section 4. The impacts reported here are those for which there is scientific evidence available in published synthesis papers, what does not preclude the farming practice to have other impacts on the environment and climate still not covered by primary studies or by synthesis papers.

The synthesis papers review a number of primary studies ranging from 4 to 269. Therefore, the assessment of impacts relies on a large number of results from the primary studies, obtained mainly in field conditions, or sometimes in lab experiments or from model simulations.

1.     DESCRIPTION OF THE FARMING PRACTICE

2.    EFFECTS OF THE FARMING PRACTICE ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

(table 1)

The table below shows the number of synthesis papers with statistical tests reporting i) a significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator, that is to say, a significant statistical effect, which can be positive or negative; or ii) a non-statistically significant difference between the Intervention and the Comparator. In addition, we include, if any, the number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects. Details on the quality assessment of the synthesis papers can be found in the methodology section of this WIKI.

Out of the 40 selected synthesis papers, 32 included studies conducted in Europe, and 39 have a quality score higher than 50%.

Table 1: Summary of effects. Number of synthesis papers reporting positive, negative or non-statistically significant effects on environmental and climate impacts. The number of synthesis papers reporting relevant results but without statistical test of the effects are also provided. When not all the synthesis papers reporting an effect are of high quality, the number of synthesis papers with a quality score of at least 50% is indicated in parentheses. Some synthesis papers may report effects for more than one impact, or more than one effect for the same impact.

 

 

 

 

Statistically tested

Non-statistically tested

Impact

Metric

Intervention

Comparator

 Significantly positive

Significantly negative

Non-significant

Increase Biodiversity

biodiversity

Cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Increase Carbon sequestration

SOC

Cover crops

Bare soil

9

0

4

1

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

3

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

2

0

0

0

Increase GHG emissions

CH4 emission

Cover crops

Bare soil

0

1

0

0

Increase GHG emissions

N2O emission

Cover crops

Bare soil

2

4

4

0

Decrease GHG emissions

N2O emission

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

0

2

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

1

2

0

Decrease Nutrient leaching and run-off

N loss

Cover crops

Bare soil

6

0

2

0

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

2

0

5

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

7

0

0

0

Decrease Nutrient leaching and run-off

P loss

Cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Decrease Pests and diseases

Natural enemies

Cover crops

Bare soil

0

0

1

0

Decrease Pests and diseases

Pests

Cover crops

Bare soil

2

0

2

0

Decrease Pests and diseases

Weeds

Cover crops

Bare soil

5

0

2

0

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Increase Plant nutrient uptake

Nutrient use efficiency

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

0

0

1

0

Increase Pollination

Pollination

Cover crops

Bare soil

0

0

0

1

Increase Soil biological quality

Soil biological quality

Cover crops

Bare soil

7

0

2

0

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

1

0

Decrease Soil erosion

Soil erosion

Cover crops

Bare soil

4

0

1

1

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Increase Soil nutrients

Soil nutrients

Cover crops

Bare soil

4

0

4 (3)

0

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Increase Soil physico-chemical quality

Soil physico-chemical quality

Cover crops

Bare soil

3

0

0

1

Increase Soil water retention

Soil water retention

Cover crops

Bare soil

2

3

3

1

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

0

0

1

0

Increase Water use

Water use efficiency

Cover crops

Bare soil

1

0

0

0

Increase Crop yield

Cash crop yield

Cover crops

Bare soil

5

1

8

1

Legume cover crops

Bare soil

7

1

2

0

Non-legume cover crops

Bare soil

0

3

7

0

3.     FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTS ON CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The factors significantly influencing the size and/or direction of the effects on the impacts, according to the synthesis papers included in this review, are reported below. Details about the factors can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses available in this WIKI.

Table 2: List of factors reported to significantly affect the size and/or direction of the effects on environmental and climate impacts, according to the synthesis papers reviewed. The reference number of the synthesis papers where those factors are explored is given in parentheses.

Impact

Factors

Carbon sequestration

Cash crop (Ref11), Climatic conditions (Ref16), Cover crop biomass production (Ref4), Cover crop residue management (Ref22), Cover crop type (Ref22), Crop residue retention (Ref16), Growing window (Ref4), No factor reported (Ref24), Pedo-climatic zone (Ref4), Rotation type (Ref4), Soil depth (Ref11, Ref16), Soil pH (Ref16), Soil texture (Ref4, Ref11), Tillage (Ref4) and Time scale (Ref16)

GHG emissions

Cover crop residue management (Ref22), Cover crop type (Ref22), N fertilisation rate (Ref33, Ref38), Period (Ref33) and Period of Nitrous Oxide Measurement (Ref38)

Nutrient leaching and run-off

Cover crop biomass production (Ref28), Cover crop species (Ref28), Mean annual precipitation (Ref3, Ref28), Mean annual temperature (Ref3), N cover crop input to soil (Ref40), No factor reported (Ref38), Planting dates (Ref28), Slope gradient (Ref3) and Soil texture (Ref28)

Pests and diseases

Cash crop seeding time (Ref23), Cover crop biomass production (Ref14, Ref23), Herbicides use (Ref23), No factor reported (Ref24), Seeding rate (Ref23), Sowing season (Ref23), Ternination period (Ref23), Tillage management (Ref23), Time after cover crop (Ref14) and Type of weed (Ref14)

Soil biological quality

Annual precipitation (Ref5), Climate (Ref12), Fertilizer rate (Ref12), No factor reported (Ref24), Soil P content (Ref19), Soil pH (Ref5), Soil texture (Ref5), Soil type (Ref12), Termination method (Ref5) and Termination type (Ref12)

Soil erosion

Slope gradient (Ref3) and Vegetation coverage (Ref3)

Soil nutrients

Cover crop residue management (Ref22), Cover crop type (Ref22) and Duration (Ref35)

Soil physico-chemical quality

Associated practices (Ref17), Soil depth (Ref30), Soil texture (Ref17) and Years of treatment (Ref17)

Soil water retention

Cover crop biomass production (Ref7), Pedo-climatic zone (Ref7), Soil depth (Ref30), Soil type (Ref7) and Termination method (Ref7)

Water use

Cover crop biomass production (Ref7), Pedo-climatic zone (Ref7), Soil type (Ref7) and Termination method (Ref7)

Crop yield

Cash crop seeding time (Ref7), Climate (Ref40), Climate zone (Ref2), Cover crop biomass production (Ref7), Cover crop phenology (Ref40), Fruit tree age (Ref2), Mineral fertilisation rate (Ref40), N fertilisation rate (Ref37), Nitrogen fertilisation rates (Ref34), No factor reported (Ref24), Pedo-climatic zone (Ref7), Soil P content (Ref19), Soil type (Ref7, Ref25, Ref37, Ref40), Termination of cover crop before main crop (Ref34), Termination type (Ref25) and Tillage (Ref40)

4.    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGY

Table 3: Systematic review search strategy - methodology and search parameters.

Parameter

Details

Keywords

WOS: TS= ("cover* crop*" OR "catch* crop*" OR "winter cover*" OR "soil cover*") AND TS= ("meta-analy*"  OR "systematic* review*"  OR "evidence map"  OR "global synthesis"  OR "evidence synthesis"  OR "research synthesis")

 and

SCOPUS: TITLE-ABS-KEY: ("cover* crop*" OR "catch* crop*" OR "winter cover*" OR "soil cover*") AND TITLE-ABS-KEY: ("meta-analy*"  OR "systematic* review*"  OR "evidence map"  OR "global synthesis"  OR "evidence synthesis"  OR "research synthesis")

Time reference

No time restriction.

Databases

Web of Science and Scopus: run on 01 January 2022

Exclusion criteria

The main criteria that led to the exclusion of a synthesis paper are: 
 1) The paper is not written in English., 2) The paper is neither a systematic review nor a meta-analysis of primary research., 3) Land use is not cropland., 4) The analysis is not based on pairwise comparisons, 5) The topic of the meta-analysis is out of the scope of this review., 6) The topic is not on a/more specific landscape features. and 7) The full text is not available. 

The search returned 108 synthesis papers from WOS and SCOPUS on Cover and catch crops plus other 50 retrieved in the search of other farming practices, potentially relevant for the practice object of our fiche. 
From the 158 potentially relevant synthesis papers, 27 were excluded after reading the title and abstract, and 29 after reading the full text according to the above-mentioned criteria. Finally, 40 synthesis papers were selected.

5.     SYNTHESIS PAPERS INCLUDED IN THE REVIEW

Table 4: List of synthesis papers included in this review. More details can be found in the summaries of the meta-analyses.

Ref Num

Author(s)

Year

Title

Journal

DOI

Ref1

Crystal-Ornelas, R; Thapa, R; Tully, KL

2021

Soil organic carbon is affected by organic amendments, conservation tillage, and cover cropping in organic farming systems: A meta-analysis

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 312, 107356

10.1016/j.agee.2021.107356

Ref2

Fang, LF; Shi, XJ; Zhang, Y; Yang, YH; Zhang, XL; Wang, XZ; Zhang, YT

2021

The effects of ground cover management on fruit yield and quality: a meta-analysis

ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE

10.1080/03650340.2021.1937607

Ref3

Liu, R; Thomas, B; Shi, XJ; Zhang, XL; Wang, ZC; Zhang, YT

2021

Effects of ground cover management on improving water and soil conservation in tree crop systems: A meta-analysis

CATENA 199, 105085

10.1016/j.catena.2020.105085

Ref4

McClelland, SC; Paustian, K; Schipanski, ME

2021

Management of cover crops in temperate climates influences soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis

Ecological applications, 31, 3, e02278

10.1002/eap.2278

Ref5

Muhammad, I; Wang, J; Sainju, UM; Zhang, SH; Zhao, FZ; Khan, A

2021

Cover cropping enhances soil microbial biomass and affects microbial community structure: A meta-analysis

Geoderma 381, 114696

10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114696

Ref6

Puissant, J; Villenave, C; Chauvin, C; Plassard, C; Blanchart, E; Trap, J

2021

Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 161, 108383

10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108383

Ref7

Wang, J; Zhang, SH; Sainju, UM; Ghimire, R; Zhao, FZ

2021

A meta-analysis on cover crop impact on soil water storage, succeeding crop yield, and water-use efficiency

Agricultural Water Management, 256, 107085

10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107085

Ref8

Bai, XL; Zhang, ZB; Cui, JJ; Liu, ZJ; Chen, ZJ; Zhou, JB

2020

Strategies to mitigate nitrate leaching in vegetable production in China: a meta-analysis

Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, 18382–18391

10.1007/s11356-020-08322-1

Ref9

Chen J., Xiao H., Li Z., Liu C., Ning K., Tang C.

2020

How effective are soil and water conservation measures (SWCMs) in reducing soil and water losses in the red soil hilly region of China? A meta-analysis of field plot data

Science of The Total Environment 735, 139517

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139517

Ref10

Jian, Jinshi; Lester, Brandon J.; Du, Xuan; Reiter, Mark S.; Stewart, Ryan D.

2020

A calculator to quantify cover crop effects on soil health and productivity

Soil and Tillage Research 199, 104575

10.1016/j.still.2020.104575

Ref11

Jian, Jinshi; Du, Xuan; Reiter, Mark S.; Stewart, Ryan D.

2020

A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping

Soil Biol. Biochem. 143, 107735

10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735

Ref12

Kim, N; Zabaloy, MC; Guan, KY; Villamil, MB

2020

Do cover crops benefit soil microbiome? A meta-analysis of current research

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 142,  107701.

10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107701

Ref13

Morugan-Coronado, A; Linares, C; Gomez-Lopez, MD; Faz, A; Zornoza, R

2020

The impact of intercropping, tillage and fertilizer type on soil and crop yield in fruit orchards under Mediterranean conditions: A meta-analysis of field studies

Agric. Syst. 178, 102736

10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102736

Ref14

Nicholas, V; Martinez-Feria, R; Weisberger, D; Carlson, S; Basso, B; Basche, A

2020

Cover crops and weed suppression in the US Midwest: A meta-analysis and modeling study

AGR ENV LETT 2020;5, e20022

10.1002/ael2.20022

Ref15

Payen FT, Sykes A, Aitkenhead M, Alexander P, Moran D, MacLeod M.

2020

Soil organic carbon sequestration rates in vineyard agroecosystems under different soil management practices: A meta-analysis

J. Clean. Prod. Elsevier 125736

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125736

Ref16

Bai, XX; Huang, YW; Ren, W; Coyne, M; Jacinthe, PA; Tao, B; Hui, DF; Yang, J; Matocha, C

2019

Responses of soil carbon sequestration to climate-smart agriculture practices: A meta-analysis

Global Change Biology, 25, 2591-2606

10.1111/gcb.14658

Ref17

Basche, AD; DeLonge, MS

2019

Comparing infiltration rates in soils managed with conventional and alternative farming methods: A meta-analysis

PloS one, 14 (9): e0215702.

10.1371/journal.pone.0215702

Ref18

Gu, JX; Nie, HH; Guo, HJ; Xu, HH; Gunnathorn, T

2019

Nitrous oxide emissions from fruit orchards: A review

Atmospheric Environment 201, 166-172

10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.046

Ref19

Hallama, M; Pekrun, C; Lambers, H; Kandeler, E

2019

Hidden miners - the roles of cover crops and soil microorganisms in phosphorus cycling through agroecosystems

 

10.1007/s11104-018-3810-7

Ref20

Lee, H; Lautenbach, S; Nieto, APG; Bondeau, A; Cramer, W; Geijzendorffer, IR

2019

The impact of conservation farming practices on Mediterranean agro-ecosystem services provisioning-a meta-analysis

REG ENVIRON CHANGE

10.1007/s10113-018-1447-y

Ref21

Meyer, N; Bergez, JE; Constantin, J; Justes, E

2019

Cover crops reduce water drainage in temperate climates: A meta-analysis

Agronomy for Sustainable Development 39, 3

10.1007/s13593-018-0546-y

Ref22

Muhammad, I., Sainju, U.M., Zhao, F., (...), Fu, X., Wang, J.

2019

Regulation of soil CO2 and N2O emissions by cover crops: A meta-analysis

Soil and Tillage Research 192, pp. 103-112

10.1016/j.still.2019.04.020

Ref23

Osipitan OA, Dille JA, Assefa Y, Radicetti E, Ayeni A, Knezevic SZ

2019

Impact of cover crop management on level of weed suppression: A meta-analysis

Crop Science 59, 3, 833-842

10.2135/cropsci2018.09.0589

Ref24

Shackelford, GE; Kelsey, R; Dicks, LV

2019

Effects of cover crops on multiple ecosystem services: Ten meta-analyses of data from arable farmland in California and the Mediterranean

LAND USE POLICY, 88, 104204.

10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104204

Ref25

Toler, HD; Auge, RM; Benelli, V; Allen, FL; Ashworth, AJ

2019

Global Meta-Analysis of Cotton Yield and Weed Suppression from Cover Crops

Crop science 59, 3, 1248-1261

10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0603

Ref26

Mahal, NK; Castellano, MJ; Miguez, FE

2018

Conservation Agriculture Practices Increase Potentially Mineralizable Nitrogen: A Meta-Analysis

SOIL SCI SOC AM J,  82, 1270–1278

10.2136/sssaj2017.07.0245

Ref27

Osipitan, OA; Dille, JA; Assefa, Y; Knezevic, SZ

2018

Cover Crop for Early Season Weed Suppression in Crops: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Agronomy Journal 110, 6, 2211-2221

10.2134/agronj2017.12.0752

Ref28

Thapa R, Mirsky SB, Tully KL

2018

Cover Crops Reduce Nitrate Leaching in Agroecosystems:A Global Meta-Analysis

Journal of Environmental Quality 47, 6, 1400-1411

10.2134/jeq2018.03.0107

Ref29

Winter, S; Bauer, T; Strauss, P; Kratschmer, S; Paredes, D; Popescu, D; Landa, B; Guzman, G; Gomez, JA; Guernion, M; Zaller, JG; Batary, P

2018

Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: A meta-analysis

J APPL ECOL

10.1111/1365-2664.13124

Ref30

Alvarez, Roberto; Steinbach, Haydee S.; De Paepe, Josefina L.

2017

Cover crop effects on soils and subsequent crops in the pampas: A meta-analysis

Soil and Tillage Research 170, 53-65

10.1016/j.still.2017.03.005

Ref31

Basche, AD; DeLonge, MS

2017

The Impact of Continuous Living Cover on Soil Hydrologic Properties: A Meta-Analysis

SOIL SCI SOC AM J, 81, 5, 1179-1190

10.2136/sssaj2017.03.0077

Ref32

Bowles, TM; Jackson, LE; Loeher, M; Cavagnaro, TR

2017

Ecological intensification and arbuscular mycorrhizas: a meta-analysis of tillage and cover crop effects

Journal of applied ecology 54, 6, 1785-1793

10.1111/1365-2664.12815

Ref33

Han, Z; Walter, MT; Drinkwater, LE

2017

N2O emissions from grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of the impacts of fertilizer-based and ecologically-based nutrient management strategies

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 107, 335-355.

10.1007/s10705-017-9836-z

Ref34

Marcillo GS, Miguez FE

2017

Corn yield response to winter cover crops: An updated meta-analysis

JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION 72, 3, 226 -239

10.2489/jswc.72.3.226

Ref35

Pecio A., Jarosz Z.

2016

Long-term effects of soil management practices on selected indicators of chemical soil quality [Wpływ wieloletniego stosowania zabiegów agrotechnicznych na wybrane właściwości chemiczne gleb]

Acta Agrobotanica 69, 2

10.5586/aa.1662

Ref36

Wortman, Sam E.

2016

Weedy fallow as an alternative strategy for reducing nitrogen loss from annual cropping systems

Agronomy for Sustainable Development 61

10.1007/s13593-016-0397-3

Ref37

Valkama E, Lemola R, Känkänen H, Turtola E

2015

Meta-analysis of the effects of undersown catch crops on nitrogen leaching loss and grain yields in the Nordic countries

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 203, 93-101

10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.023

Ref38

Basche, AD; Miguez, FE; Kaspar, TC; Castellano, MJ;

2014

Do cover crops increase or decrease nitrous oxide emissions? A meta-analysis

JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 69, 471-482.

10.2489/jswc.69.6.471

Ref39

Quemada, M.; Baranski, M.; Nobel-de Lange, M. N. J.; Vallejo, A.; Cooper, J. M.

2013

Meta-analysis of strategies to control nitrate leaching in irrigated agricultural systems and their effects on crop yield

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT

10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.018

Ref40

Tonitto, C; David, MB; Drinkwater, LE

2006

Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: A meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 112, 58–72.

10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.003

 

Disclaimer: These fiches present a large amount of scientific knowledge synthesised to assess farming practices impacts on the environment, climate and productivity. The European Commission maintains this WIKI to enhance public access to information about its initiatives. Our goal is to keep this information timely and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will try to correct them. However, the Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the information on these fiches


[1] Synthesis research papers include either meta-analysis or systematic reviews with quantitative results. Details can be found in the methodology section of the WIKI.

[2] Inglett, P.W., Reddy, K.R., Corstanje, R., 2005. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment | ScienceDirect.