Welcome
Include Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
Excerpt Include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This page explains the first of these steps, the completion of the consolidation assignment. We are using a KA120 - Erasmus accreditation application assessment as an example.
For an overview of the assessment process, see page Expert Assessment. For general functionality in assessments, please consult the page Assessment Details basic functionalities. For specific assessments, please also consult the dedicated pages:
Content by Label | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For a list of all available wiki pages regarding expert assessments, see Assessment module for experts - Index.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Numbered Headings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Access "My Assessments" from Single Entry Point
Filter your assignment(s) in the status "Consolidation ongoing" and open the assignment to work onConsolidator assignments requiring your attention will be in the status Consolidation ongoing. Use the available Search filters to filter the results list according to your needs. See Search and filter in My Assessmentsfor details. In our example, we filter for a specific assessment in the status Consolidation ongoing. Click on the hyperlinked Project Code, or click on the Actions button and select the option Open assessment to open the Assessment details.
"Assessment Details" opens in new tabThe Assessment Details for the selected project assessment will open in edit mode in a new tab in your browser. By default, the Award criteria section displays, opened on the Consolidator tab.
"Project information" tabWhen opening an assessment from My Assessments it will always open the assessment on the Project Information by default. The information available here is relevant for the given assignment. Available subsections under Project Information may include Application, Budget information, Assessments and Reports:
You may have to use the scroll bars of your browser to see all available sections. For available files, you have the options to:
In consolidator assignments you have access to the submitted individual expert assessments as PDF files of the experts involved in the assessment of the project. Complete "Award criteria"By default, the Award criteria screen opens on the Consolidator tab. Comments and Score fields under the Consolidator tab are empty and have to be completed. You also have read-only access to the assessments of each of the experts involved in the project assessment. You can click on the available associated tabs, in our example the tabs for Expert 1 and Expert 2, to view the individual assessments. For specific assessments, please consult also the dedicated pages:
Complete Award criteria "Comments" using the "Insert" optionIn a consolidation assignment, it is possible to insert the comments the experts provided in their individual expert assignment(s) into the consolidation. To insert the comments of a specific expert:
It is possible to include the comments of more than one expert, if available and required. Simply select the other expert from the drop-down list on top of the comments field and click on Insert. The other expert's comments will also be added in the Comments field. Complete all available Comments fields under Award criteria in the same manner. It is also possible to add (additional) text by simply typing in the text fields.
Complete "Award criteria" ScoresIn most assessments, you have to provide a score for each of the subsections available in the Award criteria screen. This is done in the Score field available in the top right-hand corner of each specific subsection. The maximum score that can be given for each is displayed.
For specific assessments, please consult the dedicated pages:
While you provide the individual scores, the Consolidation Thresholds reached indicator and the overview table with the scores recorded in the header of the Assessment Details, will update automatically. Initially, for ongoing consolidation assignments, an orange badge is displayed for the Consolidation thresholds, showing the initial score as /100. The badge will change colour:
"Award Criteria" section completeWhen all information is provided, Award criteria in the Navigation is marked with a green check. In our example, the consolidation threshold was reached and all scores are in the same range as the expert scores.
Complete "Typology Questions" (if applicable)Use the available radio buttons to answer the available questions, if requiredUse the Navigation to access the Typology questions section. If Typology questions is marked with a green check in the Navigation, no action is required. The green check indicates that the experts involved in the project assessment agreed on all questions, providing the same answer for each. If Typology questions is marked with a red X in the Navigation, at least one of the typology questions was answered differently by the involved experts during their individual assessments. In such scenario, you have to answer the questions for which the experts recorded different answers.
"Typology questions" section completeWhen all questions are completed, Typology questions in Navigation is marked with a green check.
Complete "Comments"Provide the comments required using the "Insert" optionUse the Navigation to access the Comments section. The Comments section of an assessment allows the expert to provide additional commentary for applicant, beneficiary and/or NA. Some comment fields are mandatory. Depending on the type of assessment and the action type of the project under assessment, different comment fields may be available. The following options are possible:
Comments that are mandatory are marked with a red asterisk *.
The functionality to insert the comments of the experts is the same as explained earlier for the Award criteria. Complete all mandatoryComments fields under Comments in the same manner. It is also possible to add (additional) text by simply typing in the text fields. It is also possible to include the comments of more than one expert, if available and required. Simply select the other expert from the drop-down list on top of the comments field and click on Insert. The other expert's comment will also be added in the respective Comments field.
"Comments" section completeWhen all mandatory comments are provided, Comments in the Navigation is marked with a green check.
Access the "Approval" section, select the submission option and mark the consolidation as ready for expert approvalUse the Navigation to access the Approval section. The Consolidation Approval screen opens, displaying subsections for the consolidator (editable) and all involved experts (not editable for the consolidator) to either send the consolidated version for approval or, in the case of experts involved, to approve. For all sections, the orange badge displaying Pending approval request/Pending approval is shown, meaning all required actions still have to be completed. In our example, we see a subsection for the consolidator and one for the other expert involved in the consolidation process. Only the checkboxes below the Consolidator section can be checked when working on the consolidator assignment. To complete the consolidator assignment and send the consolidated version for approval to the expert(s) involved in the consolidation process:
Consolidation assignment completedThe consolidation assignment is completed. It is still possible to withdraw the consolidation from expert approval, if further changes are required at this point. See How to withdraw assessment approval for a consolidation for details. Consolidation assignment status changed to "Consolidation pending approval"Back in the list of your assignment, under My Assessments, the consolidator assignment is now displayed with status Consolidation pending approval.
ESC50 - Quality Label Application assessment specifics, call 2023 onwardAssessments for Host/Support roleThe Award criteria section for the assessment of an ESC50, call year 2023 onward, application for the Host and/or Support role will display subtabs per requested role to complete. For an assessment for the host and support role, an information message is displayed, informing you of the fact that the award criterion Relevance is considered a common criteria for both the host and support role, and that the information provided for this criterion in the assessment of one role (comment and decision) will be transferred into the relevant fields for this criterion for the other role.
Here is an example of the displayed subtabs if the assessment is for the Support role only, where the organisation already has attained the quality label for the Host role in a previous year. Only the information in the Support role subtab can be accessed and must be consolidated. No information message regarding the Award criterium Relevance is displayed. The expert assigned as consolidator inserts the experts' comments using the dedicated functionality to complete the award criteria comments per requested role during the consolidation.
If the application is for both roles, consolidating the expert comments for the award criterion Relevance results in a pop-up window displayed, informing you of the fact that this criterion is common for both the host and support role assessment. The comment provided for this criterion for one role will be copied into the consolidated assessment for the other role. Click on OK in the pop-up to confirm. Clicking on Cancel will result in the information inserted being removed from the comment field of this criterion for both roles. For the Host and/or Support role, the consolidator must decide if the outcome of the assessment is acceptable or not acceptable, using the available buttons to the right of each criteria:
You must select an option for each award criterion.
After providing the decision for the award criterion Relevance for one role, in an assessment for the Host and Support role, a pop-up window will display, informing you of the fact that this criterion is common for both the host and support role assessment. The decision provided for Relevance, for example in the award criteria of the Host role, will be copied into the assessment for the Support role. Click on OK in the pop-up to confirm. Clicking on Cancel will result in the decision selected being deselected for both roles. Any changes you make to the decision of this criterion for one role will result in the pop-up being displayed and the decision being transferred to the same criterion for the other role, after confirmation. When all the award criteria have been evaluated (either marked as acceptable or not acceptable), the outcome of the assessment for a role is indicated in the relevant subtab, displaying Awarded or Not Awarded. The overview table in the header is also updated with the outcome of the consolidated assessment. In our example, the Host role is indicated as Awarded and the Support role as Not Awarded. Continue with the consolidation by accessing the Typology questions, the Comments and Approval section. Assessments for the Lead roleIn an consolidator assignment for the assessment of a Lead role application, the Project Information section in the assessment details includes the Application, Budget information, and Assessments subsections. In the case where an organisation applied for the Host/Support and the Lead role, the Assessments section may contain the PDF versions of the assessment of the Host and/or Support role, if the assessment for the related Host and/or Support role application (for the same year) was completed and accepted by the NA, with at least one role awarded. It provides access to the individual expert assessments, consolidator assessment and, if applicable, edited version of the consolidated assessment. You can:
KA171 application assessment specificsWhen accessing the Award criteria for a KA171-HED assessment, you will notice two main sections within the Consolidator specific tab:
If the organisation applies, as in the example below, for regional partnerships within the regions Pacific (Region 8) and Asia (Region 5), the Award criteria section of the assessment will display:
You can Open/Collapse the criteria for each section, using the available buttons. For the comments to provide under the Award criteria, under General as well as Regional Questions, the consolidator has the option to insert the experts comments, as described under How to complete a consolidation assignment > Complete Award criteria Comments using the Insert option. For the all available Award criteria a score must be given. The maximum score that can be given is displayed for each criteria for your reference. In the regional subtabs under Regional Questions the outcome of the assessment for a region is displayed in the subtab if all award criteria have been evaluated and the scores have been provided. The total score will display, in green if the required threshold was passed, in red if the assessment did not reach the required threshold. Information The Total score is the sum of the score of the general question and the total score for the region. When all Award criteria are completed (General and Regional questions for each region), Award criteria in the Navigation is marked with a green check. The assessment overview table in the header is updated with the outcome of the consolidation in the consolidator column. In our example, the assessment outcome was positive. All required thresholds were met. Important The values displayed per region are calculated as the sum of the total score given under the General Questions and the total of the scores provided under the Regional Questions for the region in the Award criteria. Continue with the consolidation by accessing and completing the Typology questions. |
Include Page | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
HTML |
---|
<div class="page-break-ruler"> </div> |
Content by Label | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|